Calvin Hemery vs Hazem Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hemery vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
Calvin Hemery vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hemery has won 50.27% of points on his second serve, while Naow has won 50.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hemery, in recent form, has won 46.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 56.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.28% and 34.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hemery has saved 55.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 61.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hemery has won 63.16% of matches played (W/L 48/ 28), with Naow winning 68.29% (W/L 56/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 181/ 116), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 54/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.82% of matches (W/L 34/ 21), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.91% of matches (W/L 39/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hemery winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hemery winning 2 and Naow winning 1. The last match between Hemery and Naow was at the M15 Monastir, 07-01-2021, Second, Hard with Calvin Hemery getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hemery and Naow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hemery winning 1 times and Naow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hemery winning 0, and Naow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hemery has played against opponents with an average rank of 293.72 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 181.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hemery has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hemery has converted 36.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 44.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hemery 1 - 0 Naow
9
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
209
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
341
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
59% (359-254)
Career Total W/L
66% (151-78)
43% (9-12)
YTD W/L
76% (26-8)
$181,475
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Calvin Hemery | Hazem Naow |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 14 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 11 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 2:9:0 | 2:9:0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (54/89) | 66% (57/87) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (40/54) | 58% (33/57) |
2nd Serve Win% | 34% (12/35) | 47% (14/30) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 36% (4/11) |
Return Points W% | 46% (40/87) | 42% (37/89) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 2-6 6-3 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Hazem Naow
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
7
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Calvin Hemery | Hazem Naow |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 43% (9/12) | 76% (26/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (21/26) | 70% (54/23) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (223/236) | 57% (407/308) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 78% (7/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 76% (19/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.61 | 0.21 |
Aces Total | 135 | 75 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.35 |
DFs Total | 53 | 123 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:3 | 1:38:21 |
Avg Opp Rank | 331 | 229.18 |
1st Serve % | 64% (889/1396) | 63% (1484/2347) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (641/889) | 70% (1043/1484) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (258/507) | 50% (429/863) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (39/112) | 44% (119/273) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (509/1432) | 43% (999/2323) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 78% (14/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (12/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (8/20) | 76% (26/34) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 57% (4/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 78% (7/9) |
1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 100% (22/22) |
1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (22/0) |
1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 33% (12/4) |
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
6
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
9
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Goffin
Player
Calvin Hemery
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Felix Gill
Player
Calvin Hemery
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 ret. | H2H |
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucas Pouille
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
4
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
47 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H |
view more