Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Calvin Hemery vs Lilian Breut Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hemery vs Breut analysis and find out who is favored!
Calvin Hemery vs Lilian Breut Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hemery has won 50.27% of points on his second serve, while Breut has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hemery, in recent form, has won 46.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Breut has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hemery has saved 55.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Breut has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hemery has won 63.16% of matches played (W/L 48/ 28), with Breut winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 181/ 116), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Breut has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 16/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.82% of matches (W/L 34/ 21), where as Breut has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hemery winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hemery winning 2 and Breut winning 0. The last match between Hemery and Breut was at the M25 Sierre, 01-09-2021, First, Clay with Calvin Hemery getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hemery and Breut have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hemery winning 0 times and Breut 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hemery winning 0, and Breut 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hemery has played against opponents with an average rank of 293.72 while Breut has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hemery has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Breut has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hemery has converted 36.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Breut has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hemery 1 - 0 Breut
209
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
59% (360-254)
Career Total W/L
50% (39-39)
45% (10-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$181,475
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Calvin Hemery | Lilian Breut |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (34/55) | 62% (26/42) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (25/34) | 42% (11/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (10/21) | 38% (6/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (25/42) | 36% (20/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Calvin Hemery
Player
Lilian Breut
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Calvin Hemery | Lilian Breut |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (21/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (223/236) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.61 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 135 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:3 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 331 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (889/1396) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (641/889) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (258/507) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (39/112) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (509/1432) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (8/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
6
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
9
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Calvin Hemery
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Calvin Hemery
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Lilian Breut Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Lilian Breut
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lilian Breut
Player
Julien De Cuyper
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
49%
(
28 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Lilian Breut
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
18%
(
4 of
22)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lilian Breut
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Lilian Breut
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Breut
Player
Lucas Andriamasilalao
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lilian Breut
Player
Max Cunat
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lilian Breut
Player
Timofey Stepanov
38%
(
21 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Lilian Breut
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(6) 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Hemery Vs Breut Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
