Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo UGO Carabelli vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo UGO Carabelli vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fanselow has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fanselow winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Carabelli 0 - 0 Fanselow
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Camilo UGO Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luis Britto
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martyn Pawelski
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
11
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
59 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
119)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
85)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
13
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
7
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(0) 0-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Tomas Curras Abasolo
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Federico Iannaccone
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Fanselow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
