Carl Emil Overbeck vs Marc Polmans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 02:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Emil Overbeck vs M. Polmans

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Overbeck 1 - 0 Polmans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Carl Emil Overbeck winning 2 and Marc Polmans winning 0. The last match between Carl Emil Overbeck and Marc Polmans was at the M25 Brisbane, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Carl Emil Overbeck getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Overbeck | 1 |
| Polmans | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Brisbane(10-30-25)
C. E. Overbeck vs M. Polmans H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $642,775 |
| 62.86% (44-26) | Career Total W/L | 55.90% (374-295) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 15 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. E. Overbeck vs M. Polmans Match Preview:
- How do their second serve percentages compare? Marc Polmans wins 42.92% of points on second serve, slightly edging out Carl Emil Overbeck's 41.49%.
- When considering their return game, Polmans captures 46.80% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Overbeck is just a fraction ahead at 47.00%.
- Looking at first serve return statistics, Overbeck holds a stronger edge, winning 29.90% compared to Polmans' 27.22%.
- In pressure situations, Polmans appears more efficient, saving 55.35% of breakpoints, compared to Overbeck’s 49.01%.
- What about overall match performance over the past year? Polmans has a slightly higher win rate at 63.46% (33 wins out of 52 matches), compared to Overbeck's 62.07% (18 wins out of 29 matches).
- Both players have their best career win percentage on hard courts, boasting 57% each.
- Considering the level of tournaments played: Polmans won 69.77% of his matches in lower-level events, versus Overbeck's 64.29%.
- Who competes against tougher opponents? Overbeck has faced players with an average rank of 359.28, while Polmans' opponents average at 398.12.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Overbeck has a better track record, winning 67% compared to Polmans’ 53%.
- It is essential to consider their current form in the ongoing event, which greatly impacts predictions.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
The subtle differences in second serve performance slightly favor Marc Polmans, but Carl Emil Overbeck’s superior first serve return game may counteract this advantage.
While Polmans displays stronger composure under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints, Overbeck's ability to perform when the match is at its most critical, evidenced by his superior record in deciding sets, could be decisive.
Both players excel on hard courts, and their recent records show negligible separation in win rates. However, Overbeck's encounters with higher-ranked opponents might have prepared him better for high-intensity matches.
With all factors considered, Carl Emil Overbeck appears to have a slight edge, making him the favorite to win this upcoming match.
Carl Emil Overbeck vs Marc Polmans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. E. Overbeck vs M. Polmans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:45:42 | Average Match Time | 1:45:42 |
| 58% (41/71) | 1st Serve % | 78% (47/60) |
| 76% (31/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (34/47) |
| 63% (19/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (4/13) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 37% (22/60) | Return Points Win % | 30% (21/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played
M. Polmans Recent Matches Played

C. E. Overbeck vs M. Polmans Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.86% (44/26) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.90% (374/295) |
| 59.87% (94/63) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.46% (861/720) |
| 54.38% (801/672) | Games Win/Loss | 52.03% (7745/7140) |
| 70.59% (12/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.28% (232/173) |
| 60.42% (29/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.93% (99/78) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.71% (16/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 51.92% (27/25) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 196 | Aces Total | 1931 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 161 | Total Double Faults | 1932 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:33:15 |
| 308.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 496.82 |
| 64% (2214/3449) | 1st Serve % | 66% (27620/42123) |
| 67% (1483/2214) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (18752/27620) |
| 47% (575/1235) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7207/14503) |
| 44% (162/368) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1871/4396) |
| 42% (1424/3399) | Return Points Win % | 41% (17377/42890) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40.35% (23/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 40.43% (19/28) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 50.47% (160/157) |
| 65.67% (44/23) | Futures W/L | 70.42% (169/71) |
| 63% (44/70) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (363/646) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 45% (5/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (100/200) |
| 65% (11/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (121/229) |
| 95% (38/36) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (369/313) |
| 5% (38/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (369/56) |
| 25% (32/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (298/61) |