Prediction of Cathy Lee Crosby vs Tam Oshaughnessy Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lee Crosby vs T. Oshaughnessy

Cathy Lee Crosby

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Tam Oshaughnessy

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Crosby 1 - 0 Oshaughnessy

They have played 3 sets in total, with Cathy Lee Crosby winning 2 and Tam Oshaughnessy winning 1. The last match between Cathy Lee Crosby and Tam Oshaughnessy was at the Los Angeles, 18-09-1967, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cathy Lee Crosby getting the victory 9-7 8-10 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Crosby	1
Oshaughnessy	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Los Angeles(09-18-67)

Stats

Cathy Lee Crosby

Tam Oshaughnessy

C. L. Crosby vs T. Oshaughnessy H2H Profile

C. L. Crosby	Stats	T. Oshaughnessy
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
39.22% (20-31)	Career Total W/L	35.62% (52-94)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. L. Crosby vs T. Oshaughnessy Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cathy Lee Crosby has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tam Oshaughnessy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cathy Lee Crosby, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tam Oshaughnessy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cathy Lee Crosby has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tam Oshaughnessy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cathy Lee Crosby has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tam Oshaughnessy winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cathy Lee Crosby has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 14/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/4). Tam Oshaughnessy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 11/17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 19% (W/L 3/13).
Player level: In the last year, Cathy Lee Crosby has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tam Oshaughnessy has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cathy Lee Crosby winning 1 times and Tam Oshaughnessy being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cathy Lee Crosby winning 2 and Tam Oshaughnessy winning 1.
The last match between Cathy Lee Crosby and Tam Oshaughnessy was at the Los Angeles, 18-09-1967, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cathy Lee Crosby getting the victory 9-7 8-10 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cathy Lee Crosby has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tam Oshaughnessy has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cathy Lee Crosby has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tam Oshaughnessy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cathy Lee Crosby has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tam Oshaughnessy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cathy Lee Crosby vs Tam Oshaughnessy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. Crosby vs T. Oshaughnessy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. Crosby	Stats	T. Oshaughnessy
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
23	Games Won	20
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. Crosby Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Los Angeles - 18-09-1967
R2 Tam OshaughnessyT. Oshaughnessy	W	9-7 8-10 6-3	Stats
R3 Kerry ReidK. Reid	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Los Angeles - 15-09-1966
R4 Tory Ann FretzT. Ann	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Q3 Marilyn ShapiroM. Shapiro	W	8-6 6-2	Stats
R3 Mimi WheelerM. Wheeler	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Oshaughnessy Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 23-06-1975
Q1 Daria KopsicD. Kopsic	L	6-3 9-8	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1974
Q1 Daria KopsicD. Kopsic	L	6-3 9-8	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 10-06-1974
R2 Penny MoorP. Moor	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Hilton Head - 30-04-1974
Q1 Lindsay BlachfordL. Blachford	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Atlanta - 22-04-1974
R3 Mimi WikstedtM. Wikstedt	L	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

C. L. Crosby vs T. Oshaughnessy Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. Crosby	Stats	T. Oshaughnessy
39.22% (20/31)	YTD Win/Loss	35.62% (52/94)
39.42% (41/63)	Sets Win/Loss	35.53% (108/196)
44.03% (428/544)	Games Win/Loss	100.00% (1179/0)
53.85% (14/12)	Hard Win/Loss	30.77% (12/27)
0.00% (0/4)	Clay Win/Loss	39.29% (11/17)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	45.71% (16/19)
29.41% (5/12)	Grass Win/Loss	18.75% (3/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0.43	Average Opponent Rank	17.97
16.67% (1/5)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/3)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	37.50% (9/15)
34% (15/44)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	33% (46/138)
36% (4/11)	Deciding Set Win %	44% (12/27)
84% (19/16)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (47/41)
16% (19/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (47/6)
4% (28/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	7% (91/6)