search

Cem Ilkel vs Bjorn Fratangelo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Fratangelo analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Cem Ilkel vs Bjorn Fratangelo Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.74% of points on his second serve, while Fratangelo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fratangelo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fratangelo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 29), with Fratangelo winning 42.86% (W/L 3/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Fratangelo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 179/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 21/ 17).
  • Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Fratangelo has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 0 and Fratangelo winning 2. The last match between Ilkel and Fratangelo was at the Biella 6 Challenger, 17-05-2021, First, Clay with Bjorn Fratangelo getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:55.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Fratangelo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Fratangelo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Fratangelo 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.83 while Fratangelo has played against players with an average rank of 270.71.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fratangelo has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 44.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fratangelo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Ilkel 0 - 1 Fratangelo

Cem Ilkel

5

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

415

Rank

144

High

28

Age

R

Plays

0

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

794

Rank

99

High

30

Age

R

Plays

Bjorn Fratangelo

12

Total

0

Mast

4

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

8

Minor

0

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L L W W W L L W L L

Form

W L L W L W W L L L

56% (400-309)

Career Total W/L

60% (401-270)

44% (8-10)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$225,530

Career Prize Money

$948,485

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Ilkel VS Fratangelo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Cem Ilkel Bjorn Fratangelo
All H2H Matches 0 1
Sets Won 0 2
Games Won 6 12
Aces (Total) 5 2
DFs (Total) 4 2
Avg Match Time 1:34:55 1:34:55
1st Serve % 62% (38/61) 56% (31/55)
1st Serve Win% 63% (24/38) 81% (25/31)
2nd Serve Win% 43% (10/23) 50% (12/24)
BPs Won% (Total) 25% (1/4) 57% (4/7)
Return Points W% 33% (18/55) 44% (27/61)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set L, W 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)

Ilkel VS Fratangelo H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 6-4
cross
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Cem Ilkel
56% ( 31 of 55)
1st Serve %
62% ( 38 of 61)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
81% ( 25 of 31)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 24 of 38)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
33% ( 18 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 27 of 61)
64
Total Points Won
52

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Cem Ilkel Bjorn Fratangelo
YTD W/L 44% (8/10) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 43% (17/23) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 46% (165/195) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 43% (3/4) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 45% (5/6) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.54 0
Aces Total 94 0
DFs per game 0.24 0
DFs Total 42 0
Avg Match Time 1:28:14 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 162.39 0
1st Serve % 57% (616/1073) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 72% (442/616) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 46% (210/457) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 43% (32/74) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 36% (378/1044) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/1) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 50% (7/7) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 33% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 41% (7/17) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 80% (4/5) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 60% (3/5) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 75% (8/6) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 25% (8/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 20% (10/2) 0% (0/0)

Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71% ( 50 of 70)
1st Serve %
66% ( 49 of 74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74% ( 37 of 50)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 34 of 49)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
33% ( 23 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 29 of 74)
76
Total Points Won
68
L
1-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71% ( 36 of 51)
1st Serve %
51% ( 23 of 45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81% ( 29 of 36)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 17 of 23)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
24% ( 12 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 18 of 45)
57
Total Points Won
39
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47% ( 34 of 72)
1st Serve %
61% ( 39 of 64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82% ( 28 of 34)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 27 of 39)
50% ( 19 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
35% ( 25 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 25 of 64)
72
Total Points Won
64
W
6-4 7-6(4) H2H
R1
cross
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64% ( 28 of 44)
1st Serve %
48% ( 19 of 40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 9 of 19)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 7 of 21)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
30% ( 13 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 24 of 40)
55
Total Points Won
29
L
6-0 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62% ( 21 of 34)
1st Serve %
60% ( 28 of 47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100% ( 21 of 21)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
38% ( 5 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
24% ( 8 of 34)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 28 of 47)
54
Total Points Won
27
L
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51% ( 25 of 49)
1st Serve %
54% ( 30 of 56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68% ( 17 of 25)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 16 of 30)
54% ( 13 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
23% ( 6 of 26)
46% ( 6 of 13)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
39% ( 19 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 34 of 56)
64
Total Points Won
41
W
6-0 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61% ( 46 of 76)
1st Serve %
59% ( 53 of 90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76% ( 35 of 46)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 39 of 53)
60% ( 18 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 23 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 34 of 90)
87
Total Points Won
79
W
7-6(6) 7-6(2) H2H
Q1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55% ( 56 of 102)
1st Serve %
55% ( 54 of 98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80% ( 45 of 56)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 38 of 54)
41% ( 19 of 46)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 21 of 44)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 3 of 12)
37% ( 38 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 39 of 98)
103
Total Points Won
97
W
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71% ( 40 of 56)
1st Serve %
59% ( 42 of 71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88% ( 35 of 40)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 28 of 42)
50% ( 8 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 13 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 27 of 71)
70
Total Points Won
57
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60% ( 62 of 103)
1st Serve %
60% ( 52 of 87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66% ( 41 of 62)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 38 of 52)
49% ( 20 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 13 of 35)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
41% ( 42 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 36 of 87)
97
Total Points Won
93
L
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) H2H

Bjorn Fratangelo Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
57% ( 51 of 89)
1st Serve %
46% ( 38 of 83)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76% ( 39 of 51)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 20 of 38)
47% ( 18 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
62% ( 28 of 45)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
36% ( 32 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 35 of 83)
92
Total Points Won
80
L
6-3 4-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Gael Monfils
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
65% ( 33 of 51)
1st Serve %
67% ( 41 of 61)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88% ( 29 of 33)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 25 of 41)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 12 of 20)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
20% ( 10 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 24 of 61)
65
Total Points Won
47
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
66% ( 53 of 80)
1st Serve %
66% ( 63 of 96)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77% ( 41 of 53)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 44 of 63)
44% ( 12 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 15 of 33)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 27 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 37 of 96)
90
Total Points Won
86
L
4-6 6-3 3-6 H2H
QF
cross
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Alexis Galarneau
66% ( 53 of 80)
1st Serve %
66% ( 63 of 96)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77% ( 41 of 53)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 44 of 63)
44% ( 12 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 15 of 33)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 27 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 37 of 96)
90
Total Points Won
86
W
6-4 3-6 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65% ( 76 of 117)
1st Serve %
64% ( 72 of 112)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
68% ( 52 of 76)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 47 of 72)
49% ( 20 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 23 of 40)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
38% ( 45 of 117)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 42 of 112)
114
Total Points Won
115
W
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Calvin Hemery
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
61% ( 43 of 71)
1st Serve %
67% ( 48 of 72)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81% ( 35 of 43)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 33 of 48)
64% ( 18 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
25% ( 1 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
25% ( 18 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 26 of 72)
79
Total Points Won
64
L
7-6(1) 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
58% ( 28 of 48)
1st Serve %
53% ( 27 of 51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68% ( 19 of 28)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 4 of 24)
47% ( 7 of 15)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
40% ( 19 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
65% ( 33 of 51)
62
Total Points Won
37
W
6-2 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
70% ( 39 of 56)
1st Serve %
66% ( 42 of 64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79% ( 31 of 39)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 27 of 42)
53% ( 9 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 8 of 22)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
29% ( 16 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 29 of 64)
69
Total Points Won
51
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
70% ( 67 of 96)
1st Serve %
59% ( 55 of 94)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66% ( 44 of 67)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 40 of 55)
66% ( 19 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 19 of 39)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 33 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 35 of 94)
98
Total Points Won
92
L
3-6 6-3 7-6(0) H2H
R1
cross
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
46% ( 30 of 65)
1st Serve %
67% ( 40 of 60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83% ( 25 of 30)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 25 of 40)
51% ( 18 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 10 of 20)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
34% ( 22 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 25 of 60)
68
Total Points Won
57
W
6-4 7-5 H2H

Ilkel Vs Fratangelo Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions