Cem Ilkel vs Marc Sieber Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Sieber analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Marc Sieber Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.92% of points on his second serve, while Sieber has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 52.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sieber has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.2% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sieber has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 18/ 27), with Sieber winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Sieber has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 131/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Sieber has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Ilkel winning 3 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 7 and Sieber winning 3. The last match between Ilkel and Sieber was at the Turkey F7 (Antalya), 21-02-2017, First, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Sieber have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ilkel winning 1 times and Sieber 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 2, and Sieber 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.76 while Sieber has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sieber has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sieber has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 3 - 1 Sieber
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
390
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
3
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
236
High
36
Age
L
Plays
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
Form
57% (399-307)
Career Total W/L
63% (429-249)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$660
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Marc Sieber |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
Sets Won | 7 | 3 |
Games Won | 53 | 44 |
Aces (Total) | 19 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 16 |
Avg Match Time | 2:12:0 | 2:12:0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (228/354) | 70% (240/344) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (142/228) | 59% (141/240) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (65/126) | 44% (46/104) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (18/55) | 31% (15/48) |
Return Points W% | 46% (157/344) | 42% (147/354) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 33% (3/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(6) |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marc Sieber
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
7-6(2) 6-4 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marc Sieber
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
2-6 6-4 6-4 |
Marc Sieber
Player
Cem Ilkel
78%
(
83 of
107)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
1-6 6-3 6-2 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marc Sieber
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Marc Sieber |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (136/160) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.53 | 0 |
Aces Total | 76 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 29 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:17 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 194.87 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (510/882) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (363/510) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (170/372) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (27/62) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (318/859) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Marc Sieber Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Marc Sieber
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marc Sieber
Player
Robin Kern
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Albano Olivetti
Player
Marc Sieber
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
36
Aces
10
10
Double Faults
1
94%
(
50 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
19 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Marc Sieber
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Marc Sieber
Player
Max Wiskandt
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
94%
(
15 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Marc Sieber
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Marc Sieber
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
13
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Federico Zeballos
Player
Marc Sieber
49%
(
49 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more