Cem Ilkel vs Vladimir Korolev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Korolev analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Vladimir Korolev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.92% of points on his second serve, while Korolev has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 52.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Korolev has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.2% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Korolev has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.13% of matches played (W/L 18/ 28), with Korolev winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Korolev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 26/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 12/ 21), where as Korolev has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilkel winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 4 and Korolev winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Korolev was at the Uzbekistan F3 (Andijan), 29-05-2018, First, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Korolev have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Korolev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Korolev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 251.76 while Korolev has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Korolev has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Korolev has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 2 - 0 Korolev
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
390
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
896
Rank
790
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (399-307)
Career Total W/L
60% (182-120)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Vladimir Korolev |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 0:36:0 | 0:36:0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (28/51) | 47% (34/72) |
1st Serve Win% | 93% (26/28) | 62% (21/34) |
2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 53% (20/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 43% (31/72) | 24% (12/51) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladimir Korolev
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
6-2 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Vladimir Korolev |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (136/160) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.53 | 0 |
Aces Total | 76 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 29 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:17 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 194.87 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (510/882) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (363/510) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (170/372) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (27/62) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (318/859) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Vladimir Korolev Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Vladimir Korolev
Player
Alessio Savoldi
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucas Krainer
Player
Vladimir Korolev
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vladimir Korolev
Player
Attila Boros
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Vladimir Korolev
Player
Faris Zakaryia
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Vladimir Korolev
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Vladimir Korolev
Player
Egor Khotchenkov
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
52%
(
30 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Vladimir Korolev
Player
Kaya Arinc
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more