Cengiz AKSU vs Sven Corbinais Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our AKSU vs Corbinais analysis and find out who is favored!
Cengiz AKSU vs Sven Corbinais Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), AKSU has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Corbinais has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show AKSU, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Corbinais has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: AKSU has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Corbinais has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year AKSU has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Corbinais winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, AKSU has played against opponents with an average rank of while Corbinais has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, AKSU has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Corbinais has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, AKSU has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Corbinais has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: AKSU 0 - 0 Corbinais
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Cengiz AKSU Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Cengiz Aksu
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Cengiz Aksu
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Cengiz Aksu
80%
(
74 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Peter Heller
Player
Cengiz Aksu
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Attila Boros
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Denys Klok
Player
Cengiz Aksu
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
44
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Dong Ju Kim
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stefan Popovic
Player
Cengiz Aksu
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Sergei Pogosian
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
111)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
120
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(11) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Sven Corbinais Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Sven Corbinais
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sven Corbinais
Player
William Grant
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
49 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
106
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sven Corbinais
Player
Ryan Augusto dos Santos
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Igor Kudriashov
Player
Sven Corbinais
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Sven Corbinais
Player
Aleksander Chayka
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mikail Alimli
Player
Sven Corbinais
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more