Chanchin Sookton-Eng vs Pol Wattanakul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sookton-Eng vs Wattanakul analysis and find out who is favored!
Chanchin Sookton-Eng vs Pol Wattanakul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sookton-Eng has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Wattanakul has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sookton-Eng, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wattanakul has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sookton-Eng has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wattanakul has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sookton-Eng has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Wattanakul winning 58.33% (W/L 14/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sookton-Eng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 38/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Wattanakul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sookton-Eng winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Sookton-Eng winning 4 and Wattanakul winning 1. The last match between Sookton-Eng and Wattanakul was at the M25 Chiang Rai, 06-06-2022, Q2 round, Hard with Chanchin Sookton-Eng getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sookton-Eng and Wattanakul have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sookton-Eng winning 1 times and Wattanakul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Sookton-Eng winning 3, and Wattanakul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sookton-Eng has played against opponents with an average rank of while Wattanakul has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sookton-Eng has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wattanakul has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sookton-Eng has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wattanakul has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sookton-Eng 2 - 0 Wattanakul
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
631
Rank
598
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
45% (133-162)
Career Total W/L
45% (112-139)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,420
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sookton-Eng VS Wattanakul H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Chanchin Sookton-Eng | Pol Wattanakul |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 34 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 13 | 14 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 25 |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1:46:30 |
1st Serve % | 64% (105/165) | 54% (96/177) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (79/105) | 76% (73/96) |
2nd Serve Win% | 60% (36/60) | 49% (40/81) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 11% (1/9) | 22% (2/9) |
Return Points W% | 36% (64/177) | 30% (50/165) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Sookton-Eng VS Wattanakul H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 7-6(1) |
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
Player
Pol Wattanakul
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
13
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
7-6(7) 3-6 10-2 |
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
Player
Pol Wattanakul
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
12
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Chanchin Sookton-Eng | Pol Wattanakul |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chanchin Sookton-Eng Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Edward Winter
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
44
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
Player
Kuan Yu Chen
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
Player
Adam Taylor
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Luke Saville
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rhys Searant
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 7-6(4) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dane Sweeny
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Geun Jun Kim
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
39%
(
32 of
83)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Pol Wattanakul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maximus Jones
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
11
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Kody Pearson
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Pol Wattanakul
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
2
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
11
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(3) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Chukang Wang
Player
Pol Wattanakul
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Tao Mu
51%
(
58 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
6
13
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Jimmy Yang
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jin
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
He Ziheng
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more