Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Connor DI Marco Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Marco analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Connor DI Marco Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 54.46% of points on his second serve, while Marco has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 53.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marco has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 66.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marco has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 40/ 32), with Marco winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Marco has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15), where as Marco has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 210.5 while Marco has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marco has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 40.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marco has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broom 0 - 0 Marco
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Connor DI Marco |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (26/23) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (242/239) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.62 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 146 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 56 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:9 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 145.7 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (942/1496) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (676/942) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (301/554) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (49/144) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (624/1629) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (5/5) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 1st Match |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Charles Broom
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Connor DI Marco Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-0 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Broom Vs Marco Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Charles Broom
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
