Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Jae Hwan Kim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Kim analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Jae Hwan Kim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 54% of points on his second serve, while Kim has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 54.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kim has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.66% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 64.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kim has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 54.79% of matches played (W/L 40/ 33), with Kim winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 17/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 102/ 70).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15), where as Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broom winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Broom winning 2 and Kim winning 0. The last match between Broom and Kim was at the M15 Monastir, 06-04-2022, First, Hard with Charles Broom getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Kim have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broom winning 0 times and Kim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 0, and Kim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.62 while Kim has played against players with an average rank of 164.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kim has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 39.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kim has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Kim
339
Rank
322
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
794
Rank
794
High
29
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
63% (196-116)
Career Total W/L
60% (122-83)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Charles Broom | Jae Hwan Kim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) | 52% (29/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (26/31) | 72% (21/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (11/19) | 30% (8/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (27/56) | 26% (13/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Jae Hwan Kim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (26/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (247/251) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.6 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 147 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:39 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 138.76 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (983/1559) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (695/983) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (308/576) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (52/155) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (649/1684) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Jae Hwan Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Hyun Woo Cho
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Ajeet Rai
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
9
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Sanhui Shin
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Simone Agostini
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Broom Vs Kim Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
