Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Minc vs Paul Monteban Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Minc vs Monteban analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Minc vs Paul Monteban Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Minc has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Monteban has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Minc, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Monteban has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Minc has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Monteban has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Minc has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Monteban winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Minc has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Monteban has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 31/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Minc has played against opponents with an average rank of while Monteban has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Minc has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Monteban has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Minc has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Monteban has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Minc 0 - 0 Monteban
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
A
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
815
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
38% (24-40)
Career Total W/L
53% (66-58)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Minc | Paul Monteban |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Charles Minc Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Mihai Alexandru Coman
Player
Charles Minc
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charles Minc
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Charles Minc
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Charles Minc
Player
Hazem Naow
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Monteban Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nico Mertens
Player
Paul Monteban
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Monteban
Player
Masayoshi Ono
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Paul Monteban
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Monteban
Player
Gijs Brouwer
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Vandenbulcke
Player
Paul Monteban
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Ruepke
Player
Paul Monteban
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 1-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Minc Vs Monteban Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
