Chloe Noel vs Milena Ciocan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Jun at 10:37 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Noel vs M. Ciocan

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Noel 1 - 0 Ciocan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chloe Noel winning 2 and Milena Ciocan winning 0. The last match between Chloe Noel and Milena Ciocan was at the W15 Norges-la-Ville, 12-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Chloe Noel getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Noel | 1 |
| Ciocan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Norges-la-Ville(06-12-25)
C. Noel vs M. Ciocan H2H Profile
C. Noel vs M. Ciocan Match Preview:
- Noel's recent second serve success rate is slightly lower than Ciocan's, standing at 38.32% compared to Ciocan's 38.58%. Does this small difference impact match prediction? Yes, as a higher rate is preferable.
- In return games, Noel has shown a stronger performance by winning 53.01% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Ciocan has won 51.61%. Noel also outperforms Ciocan in first serve returns, securing 38.61% of points compared to Ciocan's 31.65%.
- When under pressure, Ciocan has a clear advantage by saving 57.95% of breakpoints compared to Noel's 38.24% save rate.
- Regarding overall match success in the past year, Noel has a superior win rate at 55.56%, while Ciocan holds a 47.62%, indicating Noel's better form over time.
- Hard courts are the best surface for both players, with Noel having a slightly higher career win percentage of 56% as opposed to Ciocan's 50%.
- Noel has excelled in lower-level tournaments, winning 63.16% of Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K matches, while Ciocan has secured a 52.94% win rate in the same category.
- Despite facing lower-ranked opponents averaging a ranking of 345.07, Noel shows stronger decisive set performance with a 40% win rate. Ciocan, facing higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 285.95, has won 33% of deciding sets.
- In breakpoint situations, Noel has a commanding conversion rate of 48.28%, surpassing Ciocan's 33.33% efficiency.
Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):
Noel and Ciocan's head-to-head comparison reveals subtle but potentially impactful differences. While both players demonstrate competence in handling return games, Noel's superior performance in securing points off first and second serves offers an edge.
Despite facing slightly lower-ranked opponents, Noel's ability to convert breakpoints and perform in decisive sets marks a strategic advantage. Ciocan's strength in saving breakpoints is noteworthy, but Noel's consistent success in match victories and higher-level tournament play underscore his higher overall competitiveness.
Given these factors and Noel's slightly stronger track record on hard surfaces and overall performance trends, Noel is likely to triumph in the upcoming match.
Chloe Noel vs Milena Ciocan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Noel vs M. Ciocan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:51:38 | Average Match Time | 1:51:38 |
| 61% (50/82) | 1st Serve % | 67% (43/64) |
| 66% (33/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 44% (14/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 100% (5/5) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 48% (31/64) | Return Points Win % | 43% (35/82) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Noel Recent Matches Played
M. Ciocan Recent Matches Played

C. Noel vs M. Ciocan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.38% (99/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.24% (19/23) |
| 52.62% (231/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.15% (42/49) |
| 52.20% (2179/1995) | Games Win/Loss | 50.23% (429/425) |
| 56.98% (49/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 50.00% (24/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 589 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 602 | Total Double Faults | 166 |
| 1:26:29 | Average Match Time | 1:12:7 |
| 436.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 239.02 |
| 58% (6601/11446) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1282/2106) |
| 66% (4363/6601) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (769/1282) |
| 44% (2151/4845) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (345/824) |
| 47% (653/1400) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (123/264) |
| 45% (5244/11748) | Return Points Win % | 47% (951/2003) |
| 42.68% (35/47) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (4/8) |
| 59.81% (64/43) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 52% (98/187) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (18/41) |
| 43% (20/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 46% (29/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 74% (112/83) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (22/18) |
| 26% (112/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (22/4) |
| 21% (77/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (20/1) |