Christopher G Haworth vs Strong Kirchheimer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Haworth vs Kirchheimer analysis and find out who is favored!
Christopher G Haworth vs Strong Kirchheimer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Haworth has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kirchheimer has won 49.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Haworth, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kirchheimer has won 49.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Haworth has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirchheimer has saved 61.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Haworth has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kirchheimer winning 50% (W/L 28/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Haworth has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Haworth winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Haworth winning 2 and Kirchheimer winning 3. The last match between Haworth and Kirchheimer was at the USA F10 (Little Rock), 11-04-2018, First, Hard with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Haworth and Kirchheimer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Haworth winning 1 times and Kirchheimer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Haworth winning 0, and Kirchheimer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Haworth has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 273.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Haworth has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirchheimer has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Haworth has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirchheimer has converted 41.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Haworth 1 - 1 Kirchheimer
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
458
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
58% (36-26)
Career Total W/L
56% (271-209)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (4-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,990
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Haworth VS Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Christopher G Haworth | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
Games Won | 21 | 24 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (96/153) | 61% (91/149) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (67/96) | 67% (61/91) |
2nd Serve Win% | 32% (18/57) | 45% (26/58) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (7/22) | 43% (9/21) |
Return Points W% | 42% (62/149) | 44% (68/153) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Haworth VS Kirchheimer H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Christopher G Haworth
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
4-6 6-4 6-2 |
Christopher G Haworth
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Christopher G Haworth | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (11/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (110/125) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.44 |
Aces Total | 0 | 50 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.3 |
DFs Total | 0 | 34 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:53:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 494.9 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (460/774) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (322/460) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (157/314) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 37% (22/60) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (253/726) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/10) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Christopher G Haworth Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Felix Corwin
Player
Christopher G Haworth
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
13
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
QF |
Alexander Brown
Player
Christopher G Haworth
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Pre-Q | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Christopher G Haworth
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Holt
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Ajeet Rai
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
49
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 5-2 | H2H |
view more