Christopher Heyman vs Jakub Paul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heyman vs Paul analysis and find out who is favored!
Christopher Heyman vs Jakub Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heyman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Paul has won 50.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paul has won 58.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul has saved 59.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Paul winning 63.64% (W/L 42/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31). Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 64/ 35), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Heyman winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Heyman winning 1 and Paul winning 2. The last match between Heyman and Paul was at the Biel Challenger, 19-09-2021, Q1 round, I.hard with Jakub Paul getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:34:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heyman and Paul have played a deciding set 1 times, with Heyman winning 0 times and Paul 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Heyman winning 0, and Paul 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Paul has played against players with an average rank of 230.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul has converted 52.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Heyman 0 - 1 Paul
19
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
812
Rank
258
High
30
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
509
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
64% (352-201)
Career Total W/L
55% (173-143)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
65% (13-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,285
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Christopher Heyman | Jakub Paul |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 17 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 2:34:6 | 2:34:6 |
1st Serve % | 65% (83/128) | 74% (86/117) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (54/83) | 69% (59/86) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (24/45) | 58% (18/31) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 30% (3/10) |
Return Points W% | 34% (40/117) | 39% (50/128) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
86 of
117)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
54 of
83)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
40 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
50 of
128)
127
Total Points Won
118
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Christopher Heyman | Jakub Paul |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (27/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (223/197) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.11 |
Aces Total | 0 | 23 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
DFs Total | 0 | 35 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:37:45 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 230.15 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (912/1364) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (562/912) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (231/452) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 52% (75/145) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (593/1354) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (10/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (11/10) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (9/3) |
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Matthew William Donald
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Cina
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more