Christopher Heyman vs Jip Van Assendelft Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heyman vs Assendelft analysis and find out who is favored!
Christopher Heyman vs Jip Van Assendelft Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heyman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Assendelft has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Assendelft has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Assendelft has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Assendelft winning 63.64% (W/L 7/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31). Assendelft has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Heyman winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Heyman winning 2 and Assendelft winning 1. The last match between Heyman and Assendelft was at the M25 Den Haag, 29-06-2022, First, Clay with Christopher Heyman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heyman and Assendelft have played a deciding set 1 times, with Heyman winning 1 times and Assendelft 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Heyman winning 0, and Assendelft 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Assendelft has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Assendelft has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Assendelft has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Heyman 1 - 0 Assendelft
19
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
812
Rank
258
High
30
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
64% (352-201)
Career Total W/L
50% (23-23)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Heyman VS Assendelft H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Christopher Heyman | Jip Van Assendelft |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 2:5:0 | 2:5:0 |
1st Serve % | 82% (70/85) | 66% (53/80) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (52/70) | 70% (37/53) |
2nd Serve Win% | 67% (10/15) | 44% (12/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/3) |
Return Points W% | 39% (31/80) | 27% (23/85) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Heyman VS Assendelft H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Christopher Heyman | Jip Van Assendelft |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jip Van Assendelft Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Stijn Paardekooper
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jip Van Assendelft
Player
Matyas Fuele
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jip Van Assendelft
Player
Jack Loge
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF |
Charlelie Cosnet
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H |
view more