Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Christopher Heyman vs Nicolae Frunza Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heyman vs Frunza analysis and find out who is favored!
Christopher Heyman vs Nicolae Frunza Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heyman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Frunza has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Frunza has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Frunza has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Frunza winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31). Frunza has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 192/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Heyman winning 3 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Heyman winning 6 and Frunza winning 2. The last match between Heyman and Frunza was at the M15 Antalya, 24-04-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Christopher Heyman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heyman and Frunza have played a deciding set 2 times, with Heyman winning 2 times and Frunza 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Heyman winning 1, and Frunza 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Frunza has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Frunza has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Frunza has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Heyman 3 - 0 Frunza
812
Rank
258
High
30
Age
L
Plays
3
Total0
1
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
883
Rank
442
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
64% (352-201)
Career Total W/L
63% (217-129)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Christopher Heyman | Nicolae Frunza |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
| Games Won | 41 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:20 | 2:2:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (180/250) | 64% (137/215) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (119/180) | 60% (82/137) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (26/70) | 47% (37/78) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (14/21) | 38% (10/26) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (96/215) | 42% (105/250) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Christopher Heyman
Player
Nicolae Frunza
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Nicolae Frunza
74%
(
86 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
51 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
| 6-4 0-6 6-0 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Nicolae Frunza
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Christopher Heyman | Nicolae Frunza |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolae Frunza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yassine Dlimi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Nicolae Frunza
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Yanaki Milev
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
103)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
15
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Nicolae Frunza
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
46 of
97)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Nikola Kolyachev
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandr Bielinskyi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Heyman Vs Frunza Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
