Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Borna Gojo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tseng vs Gojo analysis and find out who is favored!
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Borna Gojo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tseng has won 51.2% of points on his second serve, while Gojo has won 53.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tseng, in recent form, has won 51.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gojo has won 47.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.37% and 25.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tseng has saved 62.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gojo has saved 47.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tseng has won 52.73% of matches played (W/L 29/ 26), with Gojo winning 58.54% (W/L 24/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tseng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 97/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Gojo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 117/ 66), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Tseng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 24/ 21), where as Gojo has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tseng winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Tseng winning 2 and Gojo winning 2. The last match between Tseng and Gojo was at the Bengalaru 1 Challenger, 13-02-2022, Final, Hard with Chun Hsin Tseng getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tseng and Gojo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tseng winning 0 times and Gojo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tseng winning 0, and Gojo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tseng has played against opponents with an average rank of 339.6 while Gojo has played against players with an average rank of 196.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tseng has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gojo has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tseng has converted 43.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gojo has converted 27.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tseng 1 - 1 Gojo
250
Rank
83
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
135
Rank
72
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
59% (209-143)
Career Total W/L
59% (229-159)
59% (16-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$180,215
Career Prize Money
$581,225
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Borna Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:42 | 1:20:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (58/114) | 61% (74/121) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (37/58) | 74% (55/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (27/56) | 32% (15/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 44% (7/16) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (51/121) | 44% (50/114) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Borna Gojo
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Borna Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (16/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (33/30) | 33% (2/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (306/295) | 42% (21/29) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.88 |
| Aces Total | 86 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:42 | 1:40:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 334.89 | 388 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (1041/1955) | 61% (93/152) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (726/1041) | 68% (63/93) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (468/914) | 49% (29/59) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (78/179) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (753/1920) | 30% (43/143) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (16/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 0% (1/0) |
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Joao Domingues
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Titouan Droguet
33%
(
4 of
12)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Matteo Martineau
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Borna Gojo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Borna Gojo
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
10
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Borna Gojo
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Borna Gojo
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
12
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Tommy Paul
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Aslan Karatsev
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Borna Gojo
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
76%
(
72 of
95)
18
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
54 of
72)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
39 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Borna Gojo
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
18 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Frances Tiafoe
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
88%
(
67 of
76)
14
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Borna Gojo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
73 of
114)
12
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
8
88%
(
45 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tseng Vs Gojo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
