Clement Chidekh vs Marcus Walters Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 12:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Chidekh vs M. Walters

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Walters
They have played 2 sets in total, with Clement Chidekh winning 2 and Marcus Walters winning 0. The last match between Clement Chidekh and Marcus Walters was at the M25 Sheffield, 22-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chidekh | 1 |
| Walters | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Sheffield(10-22-25)
C. Chidekh vs M. Walters H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $13,980 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.64% (191-100) | Career Total W/L | 55.77% (116-92) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Chidekh vs M. Walters Match Preview:
- Recently, Marcus Walters has been slightly more effective on second serves, winning 44.63% of points compared to Clement Chidekh's 42.73%. This statistic is often crucial for predicting match outcomes.
- When analyzing return games, Chidekh has been more successful, capturing 45.77% of opponents' second serve points, while Walters secured 41.89%. Chidekh also has an edge in returning first serves, with 29.75% to Walters' 25.00%.
- Under pressure, Walters shows resilience by saving 58.63% of breakpoints, marginally outperforming Chidekh's 56.35% in this category.
- In terms of overall match success over the past year, Walters leads with a win rate of 66.00% (33/17), whereas Chidekh has a 60.26% win rate (47/31).
- Both players excel on specific surfaces: Chidekh is most successful on Hard courts (69% win rate), while Walters finds his strength on Clay surfaces with a 69% win rate.
- Match level influences outcomes, with Chidekh competing mainly at the Challengers/ITF level, achieving a 51.22% success rate, whereas Walters excels in Futures/Satellites circuit, winning 66.00% of his matches.
- Comparing opponent quality, Walters has faced tougher competitors, with an average opponent rank of 251.84 compared to Chidekh's 362.91.
- In deciding sets, Walters again holds a small advantage, winning 50% compared to Chidekh's 43% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Both players showcase strengths that could sway the match. Walters has a slight edge in second serve performance, breakpoints saved under pressure, and deciding set victories. His superior win rate in matches played over the last year also contributes to his advantage.
On the other hand, Chidekh displays a strong return game, especially against second serves, providing him with ample opportunities to break service games. However, the higher caliber of Walters' opponents implies he has been challenging himself against tougher competition.
Taking into account the comparative analysis of current form and relevant statistics, Marcus Walters emerges as the likely favorite to win this upcoming tennis match.
Clement Chidekh vs Marcus Walters Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Chidekh vs M. Walters H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:27:24 | Average Match Time | 1:27:24 |
| 61% (30/49) | 1st Serve % | 73% (41/56) |
| 83% (25/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (24/41) |
| 63% (12/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (25/56) | Return Points Win % | 24% (12/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Chidekh Recent Matches Played
M. Walters Recent Matches Played

C. Chidekh vs M. Walters Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.52% (190/100) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.77% (116/92) |
| 62.75% (416/247) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.05% (259/195) |
| 55.17% (3353/2725) | Games Win/Loss | 52.98% (2277/2021) |
| 69.01% (98/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.82% (68/42) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 72.73% (8/3) |
| 65.12% (84/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.34% (38/44) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 654 | Aces Total | 342 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 897 | Total Double Faults | 205 |
| 1:35:8 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 414.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 297.65 |
| 62% (11445/18415) | 1st Serve % | 66% (4951/7490) |
| 67% (7700/11445) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3327/4951) |
| 52% (3605/6970) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1303/2539) |
| 46% (999/2179) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (287/694) |
| 43% (8224/19083) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2890/7474) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.13% (51/45) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 73.89% (133/47) | Futures W/L | 56.22% (113/88) |
| 65% (186/285) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (116/207) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (31/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (39/64) |
| 55% (47/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 32% (12/38) |
| 91% (187/170) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (124/110) |
| 9% (187/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (124/13) |
| 18% (103/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (84/6) |