Clement Chidekh vs Phillip Jordan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 10:14 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Chidekh vs P. Jordan

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Jordan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Clement Chidekh winning 2 and Phillip Jordan winning 0. The last match between Clement Chidekh and Phillip Jordan was at the M25 Sheffield, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chidekh | 1 |
| Jordan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sheffield(10-21-25)
C. Chidekh vs P. Jordan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $13,980 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.65% (193-101) | Career Total W/L | 61.29% (57-36) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Chidekh vs P. Jordan Match Preview:
- Considering recent second serve performance, Clement Chidekh has a slight edge, securing 42.66% of points compared to Phillip Jordan’s 41.49%.
- Both players are quite evenly matched in return game stats. Chidekh wins 45.81% of opponent’s second serve points, marginally outperforming Jordan, who wins 45.06%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Jordan has a slight advantage, winning 30.48% of points versus Chidekh’s 29.88%.
- Under pressure, Chidekh shows better breakpoint resilience, saving 56.95%, whereas Jordan saves 49.74%.
- Over the past year, Chidekh has a win rate of 58.97%, while Jordan follows closely with 57.14%.
- Chidekh excels on Hard courts with a 69% win rate, whereas Jordan’s best surface is Indoor Hard, also at 69%.
- In terms of competition level, Chidekh mostly competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments, while Jordan competes in Futures/Satellites, each with respective win rates of 51.22% and 57.14%.
- Jordan has faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 248.69, compared to Chidekh's 369.88.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Jordan holds a slight advantage by winning 44% versus Chidekh’s 41%.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Both Clement Chidekh and Phillip Jordan present competitive stats, making for a closely matched contest. Chidekh has a slight edge in second serve points and breakpoint resiliency, suggesting a marginal advantage under pressure situations.
However, Jordan's slightly better performance in return games, particularly on first serves, alongside his ability to contest higher-ranked opponents, contributes positively to his prospects.
Considering all factors, including recent trends and surface preferences, Phillip Jordan slightly edges as the likely victor in this matchup, particularly if the match reaches a deciding set.
Clement Chidekh vs Phillip Jordan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Chidekh vs P. Jordan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:52:53 | Average Match Time | 1:52:53 |
| 63% (43/68) | 1st Serve % | 73% (46/63) |
| 67% (29/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 52% (13/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 51% (32/63) | Return Points Win % | 38% (26/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Chidekh Recent Matches Played
P. Jordan Recent Matches Played

C. Chidekh vs P. Jordan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.65% (193/101) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.29% (57/36) |
| 62.70% (422/251) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.14% (128/78) |
| 55.15% (3405/2769) | Games Win/Loss | 55.38% (1075/866) |
| 69.01% (98/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.33% (38/22) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 65.41% (87/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.54% (16/10) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 669 | Aces Total | 113 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 901 | Total Double Faults | 118 |
| 1:34:54 | Average Match Time | 1:9:36 |
| 417.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 213.59 |
| 62% (11565/18626) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2392/3722) |
| 67% (7781/11565) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1507/2392) |
| 52% (3654/7061) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (707/1330) |
| 46% (1010/2199) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (196/483) |
| 43% (8312/19295) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1778/4132) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.13% (51/45) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 73.91% (136/48) | Futures W/L | 61.29% (57/36) |
| 65% (189/289) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (57/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (31/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (17/25) |
| 56% (49/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 91% (189/172) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (59/54) |
| 9% (189/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (59/5) |
| 19% (105/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (34/3) |