Clement Tabur vs Alexis Galarneau Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Oct at 08:20 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Tabur vs A. Galarneau

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

CAN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Tabur 0 - 1 Galarneau
They have played 3 sets in total, with Clement Tabur winning 1 and Alexis Galarneau winning 2. The last match between Alexis Galarneau and Clement Tabur was at the Brest Challenger, 24-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Alexis Galarneau getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tabur | 0 |
| Galarneau | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Brest Challenger(10-24-25)
C. Tabur vs A. Galarneau H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $78,000 | Career Prize Money | $215,280 |
| 60.04% (299-199) | Career Total W/L | 55.56% (215-172) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 11 | Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
C. Tabur vs A. Galarneau Match Preview:
- In recent second serve performance, Alexis Galarneau has a win rate of 44.16%, while Clement Tabur slightly edges ahead with 44.47%. Could this marginal difference impact their upcoming match?
- Clement Tabur shows stronger return game stats, with a 47.53% win rate on opponents' second serves compared to Galarneau's 43.69%.
- For return stats on the first serve, Tabur is also ahead with 30.05%, surpassing Galarneau's 27.64%.
- Under pressure, Galarneau excels slightly better by saving 58.48% of breakpoints versus Tabur’s 54.77%.
- Overall performance over the last year favors Tabur, who has won 68.66% of matches, compared to Galarneau's 57.89%.
- Galarneau's best surface is Indoor Hard, with a win rate of 59%, while Clement Tabur performs best on Hard, also at 59%.
- Both players most frequently compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments, where Galarneau wins 62.71% of matches compared to Tabur's 60.00%.
- Galarneau has faced tougher competition on average, with opponents ranked at 255.57, compared to Tabur's 350.04-ranked opponents.
- In deciding sets, Tabur has a strong edge, winning 80% of them, while Galarneau wins 52%.
- The current event stats will further indicate player form and should be considered for predictions.
Editorial Prediction (October 24, 2025, UTC):
With Clement Tabur showing a slight edge in second serve performance, he has a marginal advantage in a critical aspect of the game. Furthermore, his ability to win more points on both first and second serve returns demonstrates his proficiency in reading the opponent's plays effectively.
Although Alexis Galarneau saves breakpoints with a higher success rate, it might not be enough to outweigh Tabur's overall stronger performance stats over the past year and his significant edge in deciding sets.
Despite Galarneau's exposure to tougher opponents, Tabur's superior match win percentage and better return game statistics position him as the more formidable contender in the match. The analysis suggests that Clement Tabur is likely to be the winner in the upcoming tennis match.
Clement Tabur vs Alexis Galarneau Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Tabur vs A. Galarneau H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 15 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:19:7 | Average Match Time | 2:19:7 |
| 72% (65/90) | 1st Serve % | 64% (58/90) |
| 72% (47/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (41/58) |
| 32% (8/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (15/32) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 38% (34/90) | Return Points Win % | 39% (35/90) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Tabur Recent Matches Played
A. Galarneau Recent Matches Played

C. Tabur vs A. Galarneau Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.04% (299/199) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.56% (215/172) |
| 57.83% (657/479) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.59% (494/411) |
| 53.14% (5682/5010) | Games Win/Loss | 51.72% (4453/4157) |
| 66.15% (86/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.74% (122/93) |
| 61.03% (177/113) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.76% (27/32) |
| 46.75% (36/41) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.72% (64/45) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1147 | Aces Total | 1193 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1137 | Total Double Faults | 1115 |
| 1:36:21 | Average Match Time | 1:39:48 |
| 447.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.24 |
| 61% (18479/30371) | 1st Serve % | 58% (15275/26209) |
| 67% (12411/18479) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (10482/15275) |
| 49% (5885/11891) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5611/10934) |
| 44% (1520/3421) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1084/2629) |
| 43% (13186/31018) | Return Points Win % | 40% (10324/25817) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Slam W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 50.34% (74/73) | Challenger W/L | 56.39% (172/133) |
| 65.29% (222/118) | Futures W/L | 64.71% (33/18) |
| 60% (295/492) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (212/383) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 56% (74/132) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (71/140) |
| 56% (81/144) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (63/128) |
| 90% (281/253) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (221/188) |
| 10% (281/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (221/33) |
| 21% (217/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (166/25) |