Clement Tabur vs Go Soeda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tabur vs Soeda analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Tabur vs Go Soeda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tabur has won 48.82% of points on his second serve, while Soeda has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tabur, in recent form, has won 54.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Soeda has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.59% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tabur has saved 59.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Soeda has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tabur has won 71.91% of matches played (W/L 64/ 25), with Soeda winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34). Soeda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 476/ 305), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 19/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 84.48% of matches (W/L 49/ 9), where as Soeda has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tabur winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tabur winning 2 and Soeda winning 0. The last match between Tabur and Soeda was at the Prague 2 Challenger, 01-05-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Clement Tabur getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tabur and Soeda have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tabur winning 0 times and Soeda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tabur winning 0, and Soeda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tabur has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.8 while Soeda has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tabur has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Soeda has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tabur has converted 38.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Soeda has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tabur 1 - 0 Soeda
9
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
203
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
683
Rank
47
High
39
Age
R
Plays
24
Total
0
Mast
18
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
61% (239-153)
Career Total W/L
58% (658-471)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$791,590
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Clement Tabur | Go Soeda |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:23:17 | 1:23:17 |
1st Serve % | 58% (38/65) | 54% (26/48) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (28/38) | 62% (16/26) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 50% (11/22) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 44% (21/48) | 37% (24/65) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Go Soeda
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Clement Tabur | Go Soeda |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (23/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (235/219) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
Aces Total | 61 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.34 | 0 |
DFs Total | 75 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:47:16 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 263.45 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (902/1463) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (614/902) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (268/561) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (64/180) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (624/1498) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (11/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
15%
(
3 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Hernan Casanova
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Emilien Voisin
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Go Soeda Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Go Soeda
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Go Soeda
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Go Soeda
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Go Soeda
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kacper Zuk
Player
Go Soeda
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Go Soeda
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Go Soeda
76%
(
90 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
80 of
117)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Go Soeda
Player
Ulises Blanch
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
115)
6
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Go Soeda
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Go Soeda
Player
Viktor Durasovic
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
35 of
42)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(0) 6-3 | H2H |
view more