Clement Tabur vs Nathan Seateun Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tabur vs Seateun analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Tabur vs Nathan Seateun Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tabur has won 47.63% of points on his second serve, while Seateun has won 48.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tabur, in recent form, has won 54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Seateun has won 53.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.32% and 38.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tabur has saved 58.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seateun has saved 54.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tabur has won 73.03% of matches played (W/L 65/ 24), with Seateun winning 47.83% (W/L 11/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34). Seateun has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 96/ 79), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 38/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 84.75% of matches (W/L 50/ 9), where as Seateun has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tabur winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Tabur winning 4 and Seateun winning 0. The last match between Tabur and Seateun was at the M15 Monastir, 04-11-2021, Second, Hard with Clement Tabur getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tabur and Seateun have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tabur winning 0 times and Seateun 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tabur winning 0, and Seateun 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tabur has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.69 while Seateun has played against players with an average rank of 122.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tabur has won 74% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seateun has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tabur has converted 39.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seateun has converted 48.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tabur 2 - 0 Seateun
9
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
203
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
891
Rank
666
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
61% (239-152)
Career Total W/L
53% (146-128)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Clement Tabur | Nathan Seateun |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 0:41:0 | 0:41:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (28/47) | 72% (41/57) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (20/28) | 39% (16/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (10/19) | 38% (6/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 61% (35/57) | 36% (17/47) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Nathan Seateun
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
6-2 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Clement Tabur | Nathan Seateun |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 57% (4/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 49% (22/23) | 50% (8/8) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (219/201) | 51% (77/75) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 50% (1/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 60% (3/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.15 |
Aces Total | 58 | 11 |
DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 71 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:17 | 1:25:8 |
Avg Opp Rank | 267.05 | 65 |
1st Serve % | 62% (848/1358) | 65% (235/361) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (579/848) | 64% (151/235) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (240/510) | 50% (63/126) |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (60/167) | 42% (18/43) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (582/1381) | 43% (167/391) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 57% (4/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 57% (4/7) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 100% (3/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (3/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 25% (4/1) |
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
15%
(
3 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Hernan Casanova
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Emilien Voisin
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Nathan Seateun Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
QF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nathan Seateun
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Marlon Vankan
69%
(
76 of
110)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
114)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Lucas Bouquet
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Toufik Sahtali
Player
Nathan Seateun
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Aymeric Bourne
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Nathan Seateun
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more