Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Colin Markes vs Drew Van Orderlain Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Markes vs Orderlain analysis and find out who is favored!
Colin Markes vs Drew Van Orderlain Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Markes has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Orderlain has won 47.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Markes, in recent form, has won 55.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Orderlain has won 59.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.82% and 36.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Markes has saved 58.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Orderlain has saved 49.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Markes has won 43.9% of matches played (W/L 18/ 23), with Orderlain winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Markes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 108/ 74), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10). Orderlain has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 24/ 27), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 33/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Markes has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13), where as Orderlain has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Markes winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Markes winning 2 and Orderlain winning 0. The last match between Markes and Orderlain was at the USA F22, 27-06-2016, Q2 round, Clay with Colin Markes getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Markes and Orderlain have played a deciding set 0 times, with Markes winning 0 times and Orderlain 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Markes winning 0, and Orderlain 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Markes has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.17 while Orderlain has played against players with an average rank of 47.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Markes has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Orderlain has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Markes has converted 36.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Orderlain has converted 49.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Markes 1 - 0 Orderlain
806
Rank
582
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (132-103)
Career Total W/L
41% (100-141)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
65% (11-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Colin Markes | Drew Van Orderlain |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Colin Markes | Drew Van Orderlain |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 65% (11/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 58% (23/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 29% (5/12) | 53% (209/184) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 67% (6/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.88 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:9 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 666 | 28.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (31/59) | 71% (365/516) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (19/31) | 60% (218/365) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (12/28) | 38% (57/151) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/3) | 59% (30/51) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (18/55) | 44% (201/453) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 65% (11/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 40% (10/4) |
Colin Markes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Colin Markes
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
Player
Colin Markes
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Echeverria
Player
Colin Markes
56%
(
65 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
68 of
113)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
41 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
113)
114
Total Points Won
115
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
A.j. Catanzariti
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
110)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
49 of
75)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Colin Markes
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
8
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
Nicaise Muamba
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
Kuang Qing Xu
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Colin Markes
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
Mark Whitehouse
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Markes
Player
Tiago Torres
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
35%
(
23 of
65)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Drew Van Orderlain Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Ryuki Matsuda
73%
(
81 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
51 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Karlo Cubelic
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kenta Miyoshi
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
66
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 0-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Markes Vs Orderlain Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Drew Van Orderlain
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
