Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Colin Van Beem vs George Tsivadze Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Beem vs Tsivadze analysis and find out who is favored!
Colin Van Beem vs George Tsivadze Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Beem has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tsivadze has won 41.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Beem, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tsivadze has won 42.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Beem has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tsivadze has saved 80% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Beem has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tsivadze winning 28.57% (W/L 2/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Tsivadze has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 84/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Beem winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Beem winning 2 and Tsivadze winning 2. The last match between Beem and Tsivadze was at the M15 Shymkent, 19-09-2019, Second, Clay with George Tsivadze getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Beem and Tsivadze have played a deciding set 0 times, with Beem winning 0 times and Tsivadze 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Beem winning 1, and Tsivadze 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Beem has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tsivadze has played against players with an average rank of 111.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Beem has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tsivadze has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Beem has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tsivadze has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Beem 1 - 1 Tsivadze
Ret.
Rank
537
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
733
High
31
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
56% (191-153)
Career Total W/L
48% (160-170)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Colin Van Beem | George Tsivadze |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 21 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:30 | 1:54:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (69/140) | 64% (101/157) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (40/69) | 58% (59/101) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (31/71) | 39% (22/56) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (9/20) | 53% (10/19) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (76/157) | 49% (69/140) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
George Tsivadze
Player
Colin Van Beem
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
George Tsivadze
45%
(
33 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Colin Van Beem | George Tsivadze |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
George Tsivadze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
George Tsivadze
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
George Tsivadze
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigoriy Lomakin
Player
George Tsivadze
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Orlov
Player
George Tsivadze
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve %
42%
(
8 of
19)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
11 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
28
Total Points Won
9
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco De Rossi
Player
George Tsivadze
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Tsivadze
Player
Ying Hou
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Beem Vs Tsivadze Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
