Colton Smith vs Evan Furness Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Oct at 07:36 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Smith vs E. Furness

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Furness
They have played 3 sets in total, with Colton Smith winning 2 and Evan Furness winning 1. The last match between Colton Smith and Evan Furness was at the Brest Challenger, 19-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Colton Smith getting the victory 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Smith | 1 |
Furness | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Brest Challenger(10-19-25)
C. Smith vs E. Furness H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$136,015 | Career Prize Money | $5,730 |
66.98% (71-35) | Career Total W/L | 57.97% (291-211) |
1 | Indoor | 0 |
2 | Titles | 9 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
33.33% (3-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Smith vs E. Furness Match Preview:
- Colton Smith has shown a significant edge in second serve success recently, winning 44.67% compared to Evan Furness's 0%. Could this indicate a strong performance advantage for Smith?
- Analyzing return games, Smith has won 46.79% of opponent's second serve points and 26.21% on first serve returns. Furness, however, has not secured any points in these areas.
- Under pressure, Smith manages to save 51.74% of breakpoints, while Furness falls short at 0%. What does this suggest about their ability to handle crucial match moments?
- Over the past year, Smith boasts a win rate of 63.79% in matches, while Furness has yet to claim a victory.
- Looking at surface preferences, Smith thrives on indoor hard surfaces with a 75% win rate. Conversely, Furness's strongest performances come on hard courts, also at 75%.
- Smith competes primarily in Challenger/ITF tournaments over $10K, claiming 68.57% of wins. Furness has been inactive at a professional level.
- In terms of opponent difficulty, Smith has faced competitors with an average rank of 225.84, suggesting a challenging field, while Furness has yet to compete.
- Should this match reach a deciding set, Smith exhibits a 74% success rate, whereas Furness again has no wins.
- For recent tournament data analysis, focusing on current performance and historical success at specific events can provide additional insights.
Editorial Prediction (October 19, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent performances, Colton Smith demonstrates a clear advantage in several critical areas of the game. His superior second serve effectiveness and return game performance indicate a higher probability of controlling the match flow.
Smith's experience and success in saving breakpoints under pressure suggest resilience during pivotal moments. His consistent ability to win deciding sets further supports his competitive edge.
Although both players have shown strength on particular surfaces, Smith's overall track record and ongoing participation at the competitive level position him more favorably.
Considering these factors, Colton Smith appears to be the stronger contender and is most likely to secure a victory in the upcoming match.
Colton Smith vs Evan Furness Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Smith vs E. Furness H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 11 |
13 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:53:22 | Average Match Time | 1:53:22 |
68% (56/82) | 1st Serve % | 48% (41/86) |
84% (47/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (28/41) |
50% (13/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (23/45) |
100% (4/4) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
41% (35/86) | Return Points Win % | 27% (22/82) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Smith Recent Matches Played
E. Furness Recent Matches Played

C. Smith vs E. Furness Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
66.98% (71/35) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.97% (291/211) |
60.64% (151/98) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.80% (643/489) |
55.04% (1310/1070) | Games Win/Loss | 52.85% (5567/4967) |
66.10% (39/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 71.79% (84/33) |
66.67% (4/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.98% (117/92) |
70.37% (19/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.43% (90/85) |
64.29% (9/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
464 | Aces Total | 1171 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
221 | Total Double Faults | 1463 |
1:34:54 | Average Match Time | 1:25:52 |
293.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 515.45 |
65% (4468/6835) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18927/30734) |
69% (3102/4468) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12713/18927) |
54% (1277/2367) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5782/11808) |
43% (302/696) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1463/3222) |
41% (2895/7116) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12611/30356) |
25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
60.00% (6/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
66.67% (6/3) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
64.58% (31/17) | Challenger W/L | 48.54% (100/106) |
77.14% (27/8) | Futures W/L | 66.08% (187/96) |
66% (68/103) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (285/486) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
32% (11/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (70/135) |
68% (28/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (75/140) |
90% (63/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (286/248) |
6% (63/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (286/37) |
26% (42/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (216/42) |