Constantin Schmitz vs Daniel DE Jonge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmitz vs Jonge analysis and find out who is favored!
Constantin Schmitz vs Daniel DE Jonge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmitz has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jonge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmitz, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmitz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmitz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jonge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmitz has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/ 12). Jonge has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmitz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jonge has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmitz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmitz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schmitz 0 - 0 Jonge
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Constantin Schmitz | Daniel DE Jonge |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Constantin Schmitz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mick Veldheer
Player
Constantin Schmitz
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Constantin Schmitz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luke Johnson
Player
Constantin Schmitz
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Zachary Eisinga
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Peter Heller
Player
Constantin Schmitz
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Dayne Kelly
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Jannik Rother
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Constantin Schmitz
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Sergeyev
Player
Constantin Schmitz
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
79 of
113)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Daniel DE Jonge Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Massimo Giunta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel De Jonge
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ignasi Forcano
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Daniel De Jonge
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
12
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
8
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more