Constantin Schmitz vs Florian Lakat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmitz vs Lakat analysis and find out who is favored!
Constantin Schmitz vs Florian Lakat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmitz has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lakat has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmitz, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lakat has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmitz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lakat has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmitz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lakat winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmitz has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/ 12). Lakat has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 67/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 16/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schmitz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schmitz winning 2 and Lakat winning 0. The last match between Schmitz and Lakat was at the Qatar F6 (Doha), 19-12-2018, Second, Hard with Constantin Schmitz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schmitz and Lakat have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schmitz winning 0 times and Lakat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schmitz winning 0, and Lakat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmitz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lakat has played against players with an average rank of 448.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmitz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lakat has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmitz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lakat has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schmitz 1 - 0 Lakat
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
552
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
883
Rank
680
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
65% (79-43)
Career Total W/L
61% (128-83)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Constantin Schmitz | Florian Lakat |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 8 | 1 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:40:0 | 0:40:0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (14/25) | 69% (20/29) |
1st Serve Win% | 86% (12/14) | 40% (8/20) |
2nd Serve Win% | 73% (8/11) | 33% (3/9) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 62% (18/29) | 20% (5/25) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 2-0 ret. |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Florian Lakat
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve %
69%
(
20 of
29)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
38
Total Points Won
16
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Constantin Schmitz | Florian Lakat |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Constantin Schmitz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mick Veldheer
Player
Constantin Schmitz
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Constantin Schmitz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luke Johnson
Player
Constantin Schmitz
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Zachary Eisinga
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Peter Heller
Player
Constantin Schmitz
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Dayne Kelly
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Jannik Rother
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Constantin Schmitz
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Sergeyev
Player
Constantin Schmitz
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
79 of
113)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Florian Lakat Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Nicolas Colne
Player
Florian Lakat
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
2
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
67%
(
32 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Florian Lakat
Player
Alexandre Reco
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
12
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 6-4 20-18 | H2H | |||
QF |
Filip Bergevi
Player
Florian Lakat
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Florian Lakat
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Florian Lakat
Player
Jake Sands
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Florian Lakat
Player
Riley Smith
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 2-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sadio Doumbia
Player
Florian Lakat
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
78%
(
76 of
97)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
6
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
57 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Petr Michnev
Player
Florian Lakat
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
13
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H |
view more