Cyril Vandermeersch vs Liam Schiemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vandermeersch vs Schiemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Cyril Vandermeersch vs Liam Schiemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vandermeersch has won 52.31% of points on his second serve, while Schiemann has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vandermeersch, in recent form, has won 51.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schiemann has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.49% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vandermeersch has saved 60.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schiemann has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vandermeersch has won 60% of matches played (W/L 30/ 20), with Schiemann winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vandermeersch has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 78/ 49), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Schiemann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 17% (W/L 2/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Vandermeersch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17), where as Schiemann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vandermeersch winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vandermeersch winning 2 and Schiemann winning 0. The last match between Vandermeersch and Schiemann was at the M15 Monastir, 28-09-2020, Q2 round, Hard with Cyril Vandermeersch getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vandermeersch and Schiemann have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vandermeersch winning 0 times and Schiemann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vandermeersch winning 0, and Schiemann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vandermeersch has played against opponents with an average rank of 115.08 while Schiemann has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vandermeersch has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schiemann has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vandermeersch has converted 47.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schiemann has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vandermeersch 1 - 0 Schiemann
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
781
Rank
670
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (91-68)
Career Total W/L
17% (3-15)
60% (9-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vandermeersch VS Schiemann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Cyril Vandermeersch | Liam Schiemann |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Vandermeersch VS Schiemann H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cyril Vandermeersch | Liam Schiemann |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (21/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (187/168) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
Aces Total | 50 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
DFs Total | 47 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:18 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 196.2 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (624/1119) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (454/624) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (243/495) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (48/110) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (451/1141) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cyril Vandermeersch Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Michael Zhu
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Andrea Bolla
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Jack Loge
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Stefano Reitano
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Umberto Giovannini
45%
(
31 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Adrien Gobat
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
111)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Alexey Vatutin
46%
(
31 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Liam Schiemann Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Paul-Georg Guenther
Player
Liam Schiemann
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more