Daiki Yoshimura vs Roy Hobbs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yoshimura vs Hobbs analysis and find out who is favored!
Daiki Yoshimura vs Roy Hobbs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yoshimura has won 38.24% of points on his second serve, while Hobbs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yoshimura, in recent form, has won 37.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hobbs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.73% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yoshimura has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hobbs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yoshimura has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 14/ 18), with Hobbs winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yoshimura has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 28/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 22/ 32). Hobbs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 69/ 125).
- Player level: In the last year, Yoshimura has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18), where as Hobbs has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Yoshimura winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Yoshimura winning 2 and Hobbs winning 0. The last match between Yoshimura and Hobbs was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 03-10-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Daiki Yoshimura getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Yoshimura and Hobbs have played a deciding set 0 times, with Yoshimura winning 0 times and Hobbs 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Yoshimura winning 0, and Hobbs 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yoshimura has played against opponents with an average rank of 44.59 while Hobbs has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yoshimura has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hobbs has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yoshimura has converted 80% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hobbs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Yoshimura 1 - 0 Hobbs
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
48% (50-54)
Career Total W/L
36% (76-133)
75% (3-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daiki Yoshimura | Roy Hobbs |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daiki Yoshimura | Roy Hobbs |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 58% (49/36) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.07 | 0 |
DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 79% (49/62) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 45% (22/49) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 15% (2/13) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (15/39) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daiki Yoshimura Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Daiki Yoshimura
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
79%
(
49 of
62)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Daiki Yoshimura
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Roy Hobbs Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Roy Hobbs
100%
(
93 of
93)
1st Serve %
100%
(
83 of
83)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kazuma Kawachi
Player
Roy Hobbs
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tommy Czaplinski
Player
Roy Hobbs
44%
(
31 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roy Hobbs
Player
Blake Bayldon
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Minhtuan Pham
Player
Roy Hobbs
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roy Hobbs
Player
Muhammad Hidayatul Rezky Djufri
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Issei Okamura
Player
Roy Hobbs
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anapat Timangkul
Player
Roy Hobbs
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
14 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more