Dan Martin vs Adhithya Ganesan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Efficiency: Over the past six months, Adhithya Ganesan's second serve has a win percentage of 43.06%, slightly lower than Dan Martin's 45.42%. Could this marginal difference influence the match outcome? Possibly, as second serve performance often correlates with match predictions.
• Return Game Strength: Adhithya Ganesan has been more effective in returning serves, claiming 48.52% of points on opponents' second serves. Dan Martin follows closely with 46.82%. When it comes to first serve returns, Ganesan again leads with 29.96% over Martin's 25.02%.
• Handling Breakpoints: Under pressure, Dan Martin seems slightly better at saving breakpoints, managing a 55.21% save rate compared to Ganesan's 54.60%. This could be critical in tight moments during the match.
• Match Win Rate Comparison: Over the past year, Ganesan has a slightly better overall match win rate at 56.36%, versus Martin's 50.82%. Does a higher win rate suggest a competitive edge?
• Preferred Playing Surface: Both have shown their best performance on clay with a 63% win rate. Neither has registered wins on grass.
• Competitive Level: Ganesan has been more successful in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments lately, with a 58.82% win rate, compared to Martin's 55.88%.
• Direct Head-to-Head: In their only prior encounter, Adhithya Ganesan defeated Dan Martin convincingly, securing both sets in their match.
• Opponent Quality: Ganesan's opponents have had a slightly higher average ranking (392.05) compared to Martin's (404.82) over the last year, suggesting Ganesan may face tougher competition regularly.
• Deciding Set Record: In matches that reach a deciding set, Martin narrowly edges out Ganesan with a 47% win rate compared to 45%.

Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):

As Adhithya Ganesan and Dan Martin prepare to face off, Adhithya has demonstrated superior second serve return stats and overall match win rates. His ability to break serves effectively gives him a potential advantage.

While Dan Martin shows resilience in saving breakpoints, Adhithya's experience against slightly higher-ranking opponents and his previous direct H2H victory suggest he enters the match with more confidence.

Adhithya also enjoys a slight edge when playing under pressure, a crucial factor in determining match outcomes.

Given the comparative analysis of both players' recent performances and strengths, Adhithya Ganesan is more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming tennis match.