Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Cox vs Alec Deckers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cox vs Deckers analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Cox vs Alec Deckers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cox has won 52.63% of points on his second serve, while Deckers has won 61.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cox, in recent form, has won 53.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Deckers has won 45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.3% and 28.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cox has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Deckers has saved 63.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cox has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 34/ 24), with Deckers winning 54.29% (W/L 19/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cox has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 233/ 115), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 26/ 30). Deckers has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 12/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Cox has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.79% of matches (W/L 25/ 13), where as Deckers has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cox winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Cox winning 3 and Deckers winning 2. The last match between Cox and Deckers was at the M15 Doha, 15-10-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Alec Deckers getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cox and Deckers have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cox winning 0 times and Deckers 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Cox winning 0, and Deckers 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cox has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.4 while Deckers has played against players with an average rank of 179.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cox has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Deckers has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cox has converted 40.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Deckers has converted 26.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cox 1 - 1 Deckers
498
Rank
206
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
646
Rank
483
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
61% (434-282)
Career Total W/L
61% (102-65)
71% (10-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$37,845
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Cox | Alec Deckers |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 28 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 21 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:30 | 2:5:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (97/135) | 65% (97/150) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (70/97) | 62% (60/97) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (21/38) | 43% (23/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 39% (9/23) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (67/150) | 33% (44/135) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Alec Deckers
Player
Daniel Cox
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
73 of
97)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Alec Deckers
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Cox | Alec Deckers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (20/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (148/110) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 78.21 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (507/778) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (368/507) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (142/271) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (41/105) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (352/833) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (10/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Cox Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Daniel Cox
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Leonardo Rossi
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Hynek Barton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Cox
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Henry Searle
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Michael Shaw
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Oskar Grzegorzewski
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alec Deckers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Alec Deckers
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Ofek Shimanov
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Joshua Goodger
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(12) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Luke Simkiss
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
16
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
49 of
60)
67%
(
26 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
26%
(
27 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
25 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alec Deckers
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
4
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
46 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
18
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
35 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
13 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Alec Deckers
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
5
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
32 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Cox Vs Deckers Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
