Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Cox vs James Marsalek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cox vs Marsalek analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Cox vs James Marsalek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cox has won 52.84% of points on his second serve, while Marsalek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cox, in recent form, has won 54.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marsalek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cox has saved 50.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marsalek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cox has won 56.6% of matches played (W/L 30/ 23), with Marsalek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cox has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 233/ 115), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 26/ 30). Marsalek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 117/ 103), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 27/ 38).
- Player level: In the last year, Cox has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12), where as Marsalek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Cox winning 7 times. They have played 17 sets in total, with Cox winning 14 and Marsalek winning 3. The last match between Cox and Marsalek was at the Qatar F2, 14-04-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniel Cox getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:23:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cox and Marsalek have played a deciding set 3 times, with Cox winning 3 times and Marsalek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Cox winning 3, and Marsalek 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cox has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.96 while Marsalek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cox has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marsalek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cox has converted 41.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marsalek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cox 7 - 0 Marsalek
497
Rank
206
High
33
Age
R
Plays
7
Total0
3
Hard0
0
Clay0
4
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
537
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
61% (434-282)
Career Total W/L
50% (198-201)
71% (10-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$37,845
Career Prize Money
$2,575
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Cox | James Marsalek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 7 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 14 | 3 |
| Games Won | 101 | 70 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:23:8 | 0:23:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (63/100) | 60% (64/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (52/63) | 69% (44/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (18/37) | 52% (22/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (40/106) | 30% (30/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (7/7) | 0% (0/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (5/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniel Cox
Player
James Marsalek
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
9
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Cox | James Marsalek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (20/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (148/110) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 78.21 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (507/778) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (368/507) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (142/271) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (41/105) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (352/833) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (10/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Cox Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Daniel Cox
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Leonardo Rossi
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Hynek Barton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Cox
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Henry Searle
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Michael Shaw
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Oskar Grzegorzewski
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
James Marsalek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Adamson
Player
James Marsalek
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
James Marsalek
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernardo Saraiva
Player
James Marsalek
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
James Marsalek
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(1) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
James Marsalek
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Alon Elia
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Daniel Entelis
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Guez
Player
James Marsalek
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cox Vs Marsalek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Cox
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
