Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Little vs Evan Hoyt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Little vs Hoyt analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Little vs Evan Hoyt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Little has won 44.32% of points on his second serve, while Hoyt has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Little, in recent form, has won 47.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hoyt has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 18.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Little has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hoyt has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Little has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 12/ 14), with Hoyt winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7). Hoyt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 124/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13), where as Hoyt has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Little winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Little winning 2 and Hoyt winning 0. The last match between Little and Hoyt was at the M25 Barnstaple, 11-02-2020, First, I.hard with Daniel Little getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Little and Hoyt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Little winning 0 times and Hoyt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Little winning 2, and Hoyt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Little has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.62 while Hoyt has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Little has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hoyt has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Little has converted 60% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hoyt has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Little 1 - 0 Hoyt
847
Rank
564
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
319
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
56% (92-72)
Career Total W/L
60% (188-127)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$775
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Little | Evan Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (65/102) | 66% (53/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (48/65) | 77% (41/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (19/37) | 56% (15/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (24/80) | 34% (35/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Daniel Little
Player
Evan Hoyt
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Little | Evan Hoyt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (28/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (120/208) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (91/120) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (39/88) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (61/194) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Daniel Little
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Daniel Little
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Thomas Deschamps
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
20
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Theo Papamalamis
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
64 of
123)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Daniel Little
84%
(
72 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Weightman
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luc Koenig
Player
Daniel Little
66%
(
81 of
123)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
127)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
127)
125
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Oscar Weightman
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
12
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Hoyt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Evan Hoyt
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Miguel Gomes
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
9
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Evan Hoyt
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Evan Hoyt
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Evan Hoyt
49%
(
49 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
65%
(
33 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Evan Hoyt
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Emiliano Maggioli
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Evan Hoyt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
11
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Evan Hoyt
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Mark Whitehouse
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Little Vs Hoyt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
