Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Little vs Miguel Damas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Little vs Damas analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Little vs Miguel Damas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Little has won 44.32% of points on his second serve, while Damas has won 51.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Little, in recent form, has won 47.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Damas has won 56.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 18.52% and 35.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Little has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Damas has saved 52.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Little has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 10/ 14), with Damas winning 51.67% (W/L 31/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7). Damas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 114/ 78), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13), where as Damas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.24% of matches (W/L 13/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Little winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Little winning 2 and Damas winning 1. The last match between Little and Damas was at the M25 Idanha-a-Nova, 13-07-2021, Q3, Hard with Daniel Little getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Little and Damas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Little winning 1 times and Damas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Little winning 0, and Damas 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Little has played against opponents with an average rank of 339.75 while Damas has played against players with an average rank of 290.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Little has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Damas has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Little has converted 60% of breakpoint opportunities, and Damas has converted 41.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Little 1 - 0 Damas
847
Rank
564
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
519
Rank
412
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
56% (92-72)
Career Total W/L
56% (164-127)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
46% (6-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Little | Miguel Damas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 22 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:0 | 2:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (56/93) | 70% (46/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (42/56) | 65% (30/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (13/37) | 55% (11/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (25/66) | 41% (38/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(1) 10-7 |
Stats 
Daniel Little
Player
Miguel Damas
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
13
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Little | Miguel Damas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 46% (6/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 45% (14/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (28/36) | 50% (141/141) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:55:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 264.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (120/208) | 57% (528/928) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (91/120) | 62% (328/528) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (39/88) | 52% (207/400) |
| BPs Won% Total | 60% (3/5) | 41% (47/114) |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (61/194) | 43% (397/934) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 46% (6/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Daniel Little
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Daniel Little
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Thomas Deschamps
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
20
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Theo Papamalamis
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
64 of
123)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Daniel Little
84%
(
72 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Weightman
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luc Koenig
Player
Daniel Little
66%
(
81 of
123)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
127)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
127)
125
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Oscar Weightman
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
12
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Miguel Damas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Miguel Damas
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Miguel Damas
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Miguel Damas
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Adria Soriano Barrera
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
5
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Miguel Damas
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Miguel Damas
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Miguel Damas
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Little Vs Damas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
