Daniel Michalski vs Timur Kiuamov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Kiuamov analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Timur Kiuamov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.5% of points on his second serve, while Kiuamov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 52.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kiuamov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.29% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 57.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kiuamov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 57.81% of matches played (W/L 37/ 27), with Kiuamov winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 180/ 93), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Kiuamov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 67/ 56), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 87).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 15/ 20), where as Kiuamov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Michalski winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Michalski winning 4 and Kiuamov winning 0. The last match between Michalski and Kiuamov was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 04-04-2019, Second, Hard with Daniel Michalski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Kiuamov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Michalski winning 0 times and Kiuamov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 2, and Kiuamov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.75 while Kiuamov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kiuamov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 44.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kiuamov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 2 - 0 Kiuamov
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
335
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
820
Rank
759
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
62% (213-129)
Career Total W/L
50% (171-170)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniel Michalski | Timur Kiuamov |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 26 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 2:1:30 | 2:1:30 |
1st Serve % | 66% (97/148) | 55% (73/132) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (65/97) | 67% (49/73) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (27/51) | 42% (25/59) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 33% (4/12) |
Return Points W% | 44% (58/132) | 38% (56/148) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 6-1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Timur Kiuamov
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
6-4 7-6(5) |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Timur Kiuamov
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Michalski | Timur Kiuamov |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (29/27) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (268/272) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 52 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:54:48 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 317.72 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (1104/1793) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (700/1104) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (355/689) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (74/164) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (713/1752) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (13/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Timur Kiuamov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Nicolas Hollender
Player
Timur Kiuamov
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Samuel Brosset
Player
Timur Kiuamov
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
70
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 1-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Timur Kiuamov
Player
Wei-De Lin
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Federico Campana
Player
Timur Kiuamov
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Timur Kiuamov
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
56
Total Points Won
54
|
1-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H |
view more