Daniel Milavsky vs Liam Krall Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 10:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Milavsky vs L. Krall

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Milavsky 1 - 0 Krall
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Milavsky winning 2 and Liam Krall winning 0. The last match between Daniel Milavsky and Liam Krall was at the M25 Laval, 03-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Milavsky | 1 |
| Krall | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Laval(07-03-25)
D. Milavsky vs L. Krall H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 67.05% (59-29) | Career Total W/L | 55.07% (38-31) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Milavsky vs L. Krall Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance influence match outcomes? Milavsky has a slight edge, winning 48.78% of second serve points compared to Krall's 43.69%, which is a crucial predictor of match success.
- In recent return games, Milavsky outperforms by winning 50.4% of opponents' second serve points, slightly better than Krall's 49.21%.
- Who is stronger against first serves? Krall leads, returning 30.02% of first serves, contrasting with Milavsky's 23.49%.
- Under pressure, Milavsky demonstrates resilience, saving 55.38% of breakpoints, surpassing Krall's 50.53%.
- Looking at overall performance, Milavsky holds a significant advantage with a 76.92% match win rate over the past year compared to Krall's 65%.
- What surfaces favor each player? Milavsky excels on I.hard courts with an 80% win rate, while Krall struggles, winning none on I.hard but 64% on hard courts.
- Milavsky dominates in lower-tier tournaments, winning 81.25% at Futures/ITF $10K level, exceeding Krall's 65% win rate at the same level.
- Despite outperforming at lower levels, Milavsky's opponents rank lower, on average 357.33, compared to Krall's, who face tougher competition at an average rank of 121.67.
- In deciding sets, Milavsky seems more composed, claiming victory in 67% of these scenarios, overshadowing Krall's 55% success rate.
- Milavsky is slightly less effective at converting breakpoints, achieving 27.74%, whereas Krall converts 28.75% of opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
Both players display distinct strengths, yet Milavsky's performance over recent months suggests a competitive upper hand. With better second serve success, higher breakpoint resilience, and overall match dominance, Milavsky emerges as a more consistent challenger.
While Krall has shown strength in first serve returns and performs well under high-pressure situations, Milavsky's superior win rate on preferred surfaces and effective breakpoint savings cannot be overlooked.
The data indicates Milavsky as more adept in high-stakes scenarios and at capitalizing on opponent weaknesses. Given these insights, Milavsky is predicted to be the likely victor in the impending match.
Daniel Milavsky vs Liam Krall Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Milavsky vs L. Krall H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:19:45 | Average Match Time | 1:19:45 |
| 64% (36/56) | 1st Serve % | 58% (38/66) |
| 81% (29/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 35% (7/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 48% (32/66) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Milavsky Recent Matches Played
L. Krall Recent Matches Played

D. Milavsky vs L. Krall Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.05% (59/29) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.07% (38/31) |
| 62.80% (130/77) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.13% (86/70) |
| 55.02% (1097/897) | Games Win/Loss | 53.54% (779/676) |
| 66.13% (41/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.78% (31/20) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 78.95% (15/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 371 | Aces Total | 100 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 275 | Total Double Faults | 135 |
| 1:31:50 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 364.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 194.99 |
| 60% (3127/5185) | 1st Serve % | 56% (1154/2054) |
| 72% (2243/3127) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (753/1154) |
| 52% (1063/2058) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (424/900) |
| 42% (220/528) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (92/219) |
| 40% (2093/5216) | Return Points Win % | 42% (838/2001) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 50.00% (10/10) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 72.06% (49/19) | Futures W/L | 56.72% (38/29) |
| 66% (56/85) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (38/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (11/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 56% (18/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 89% (55/49) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (43/36) |
| 9% (55/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (43/7) |
| 27% (33/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (26/2) |