Daniel Paty vs Dean Thurner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paty vs Thurner analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Paty vs Dean Thurner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paty has won 39.29% of points on his second serve, while Thurner has won 43.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paty, in recent form, has won 52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Thurner has won 56.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.57% and 49.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paty has saved 33.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thurner has saved 72.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paty has won 58.14% of matches played (W/L 25/ 18), with Thurner winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 90/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Thurner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 19% (W/L 5/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 18% (W/L 4/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18), where as Thurner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 8/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paty winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paty winning 2 and Thurner winning 0. The last match between Paty and Thurner was at the M15 Bratislava, 26-08-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Daniel Paty getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paty and Thurner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paty winning 0 times and Thurner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paty winning 0, and Thurner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paty has played against opponents with an average rank of 142.74 while Thurner has played against players with an average rank of 62.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paty has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thurner has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paty has converted 28.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thurner has converted 72.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paty 1 - 0 Thurner
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
698
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (104-92)
Career Total W/L
18% (9-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniel Paty | Dean Thurner |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Paty | Dean Thurner |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (33/39) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Daniel Paty
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Martin Landaluce
Player
Daniel Paty
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
David Poljak
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dali Blanch
Player
Daniel Paty
46%
(
33 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Daniel Paty
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
Matei Cristian Onofrei
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
46%
(
58 of
126)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
126)
117
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Dean Thurner Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Imran Sibille
Player
Dean Thurner
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dean Thurner
Player
Ali Alkazemi
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more