search

Daniel Smethurst vs Purav Raja Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smethurst vs Raja analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Daniel Smethurst vs Purav Raja Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smethurst has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Raja has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smethurst, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Raja has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Smethurst has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Raja has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Smethurst has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Raja winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Smethurst has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 105/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 15/ 31). Raja has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 15/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 24% (W/L 8/ 26).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Smethurst winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Smethurst winning 4 and Raja winning 1. The last match between Smethurst and Raja was at the Loughborough Challenger, 08-11-2010, Q1 round, Carpet with Daniel Smethurst getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Smethurst and Raja have played a deciding set 1 times, with Smethurst winning 1 times and Raja 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smethurst winning 0, and Raja 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smethurst has played against opponents with an average rank of while Raja has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smethurst has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Raja has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Smethurst has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Raja has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Smethurst 2 - 0 Raja

Daniel Smethurst

12

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

12

Minor

Ret.

Rank

234

High

33

Age

R

Plays

2

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

1

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

881

Rank

868

High

38

Age

R

Plays

Purav Raja

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

2

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

1

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W L W L L W W L L

Form

W L L L W L L L L L

60% (299-199)

Career Total W/L

44% (106-135)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$3,660

Career Prize Money

$500

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Smethurst VS Raja H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Daniel Smethurst Purav Raja
All H2H Matches 2 0
Sets Won 4 1
Games Won 27 14
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (2/2) 0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (2/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (2/0)

Smethurst VS Raja H2h Matches played

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Daniel Smethurst Purav Raja
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Daniel Smethurst Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
L
6-3 7-6(6) H2H
QF
cross
Marius Copil
Player
Daniel Smethurst
69% ( 70 of 101)
1st Serve %
76% ( 78 of 102)
24
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74% ( 52 of 70)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 57 of 78)
61% ( 19 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 11 of 24)
14% ( 1 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
30% ( 30 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 34 of 102)
105
Total Points Won
98
L
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 H2H
Q2
cross
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Joe Salisbury
68% ( 56 of 82)
1st Serve %
63% ( 55 of 88)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
66% ( 37 of 56)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 44 of 55)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 10 of 33)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
38% ( 31 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 34 of 88)
85
Total Points Won
85
W
3-6 6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Ross Watson
60% ( 33 of 55)
1st Serve %
62% ( 45 of 73)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
76% ( 25 of 33)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
50% ( 11 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 10 of 28)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
35% ( 19 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 40 of 73)
76
Total Points Won
52
W
6-0 7-6(1) H2H
Q2
cross
Adrien Bossel
Player
Daniel Smethurst
66% ( 54 of 82)
1st Serve %
69% ( 49 of 71)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
74% ( 40 of 54)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 35 of 49)
54% ( 15 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 11 of 22)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
33% ( 27 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 25 of 71)
80
Total Points Won
73
L
4-6 6-2 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Winston Lin
Player
Daniel Smethurst
67% ( 49 of 73)
1st Serve %
46% ( 37 of 81)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
67% ( 33 of 49)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 27 of 37)
42% ( 10 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 12 of 44)
57% ( 8 of 14)
Break Points Won
63% ( 5 of 8)
41% ( 30 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 42 of 81)
85
Total Points Won
69
L
6-4 4-6 6-1 H2H
Q2
cross
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Keith-Patrick Crowley
49% ( 24 of 49)
1st Serve %
60% ( 27 of 45)
15
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
92% ( 22 of 24)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
56% ( 14 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
27% ( 13 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 22 of 45)
58
Total Points Won
36
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Daniel Smethurst
63% ( 31 of 49)
1st Serve %
57% ( 30 of 53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 18 of 30)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
27% ( 13 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
64
Total Points Won
38
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Winston Lin
50% ( 42 of 84)
1st Serve %
62% ( 40 of 65)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
79% ( 33 of 42)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 28 of 40)
45% ( 19 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
8% ( 1 of 12)
38% ( 32 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 28 of 65)
80
Total Points Won
69
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Daniel Smethurst
62% ( 64 of 103)
1st Serve %
54% ( 59 of 109)
7
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
2
77% ( 49 of 64)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 39 of 59)
54% ( 21 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 29 of 50)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
32% ( 33 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 41 of 109)
111
Total Points Won
101
L
7-6(1) 4-6 7-5 H2H

Purav Raja Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Purav Raja
72% ( 52 of 72)
1st Serve %
42% ( 28 of 66)
5
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
63% ( 33 of 52)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 18 of 28)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 12 of 38)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
39% ( 28 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 36 of 66)
80
Total Points Won
58
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Purav Raja
48% ( 20 of 42)
1st Serve %
57% ( 25 of 44)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
80% ( 16 of 20)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 14 of 25)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
31% ( 13 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
59% ( 26 of 44)
55
Total Points Won
31
L
6-0 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Purav Raja
51% ( 19 of 37)
1st Serve %
39% ( 14 of 36)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
95% ( 18 of 19)
1st Serve Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 6 of 22)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
27% ( 10 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
69% ( 25 of 36)
52
Total Points Won
21
L
6-0 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Alexander Sarkissian
Player
Purav Raja
68% ( 27 of 40)
1st Serve %
46% ( 25 of 54)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
70% ( 19 of 27)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 8 of 29)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
33% ( 13 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 31 of 54)
58
Total Points Won
36
L
6-2 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Purav Raja
Player
Matthew Chadwick
67% ( 37 of 55)
1st Serve %
57% ( 34 of 60)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
62% ( 23 of 37)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 27 of 34)
78% ( 14 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
23% ( 6 of 26)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
33% ( 18 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 27 of 60)
64
Total Points Won
51
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
Q2
cross
Matt Reid
Player
Purav Raja
65% ( 42 of 65)
1st Serve %
70% ( 39 of 56)
17
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
83% ( 35 of 42)
1st Serve Won
85% ( 33 of 39)
65% ( 15 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 8 of 17)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 15 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
27% ( 15 of 56)
65
Total Points Won
56
L
6-3 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Roman Safiullin
Player
Purav Raja
64% ( 47 of 73)
1st Serve %
55% ( 45 of 82)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
68% ( 32 of 47)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 31 of 45)
69% ( 18 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 20 of 37)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
32% ( 23 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 31 of 82)
81
Total Points Won
74
L
6-4 7-6(6) H2H
Q1
cross
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Purav Raja
52% ( 25 of 48)
1st Serve %
53% ( 29 of 55)
0
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
10
84% ( 21 of 25)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 23 of 29)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 7 of 26)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
27% ( 13 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 25 of 55)
60
Total Points Won
43
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
Q2
cross
Clay Thompson
Player
Purav Raja
68% ( 34 of 50)
1st Serve %
52% ( 29 of 56)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
76% ( 26 of 34)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 21 of 29)
75% ( 12 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
24% ( 12 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 24 of 56)
62
Total Points Won
44
L
6-2 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Purav Raja
Player
Wilfredo Gonzalez
44% ( 36 of 81)
1st Serve %
77% ( 43 of 56)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
78% ( 28 of 36)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 34 of 43)
58% ( 26 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 6 of 13)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 9)
33% ( 27 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
29% ( 16 of 56)
70
Total Points Won
67
W
7-6(5) 6-3 H2H

Smethurst Vs Raja Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions