Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniil Medvedev vs Jason Jung Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Medvedev vs Jung analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniil Medvedev vs Jason Jung Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Medvedev has won 49.22% of points on his second serve, while Jung has won 53.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Medvedev, in recent form, has won 54.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jung has won 55.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.12% and 33.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Medvedev has saved 63.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jung has saved 62.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Medvedev has won 73.97% of matches played (W/L 54/ 19), with Jung winning 64.15% (W/L 34/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Medvedev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 237/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 78/ 44). Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 307/ 218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 26).
- Player level: In the last year, Medvedev has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 22/ 8), where as Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.89% of matches (W/L 23/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Medvedev winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Medvedev winning 4 and Jung winning 3. The last match between Medvedev and Jung was at the Erste Bank Open - Vienna, 28-10-2020, First, I.hard with Daniil Medvedev getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:47.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Medvedev and Jung have played a deciding set 1 times, with Medvedev winning 1 times and Jung 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Medvedev winning 1, and Jung 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Medvedev has played against opponents with an average rank of 92.59 while Jung has played against players with an average rank of 291.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Medvedev has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jung has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Medvedev has converted 41.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jung has converted 43.42% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Medvedev 2 - 1 Jung
4
Rank
1
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
271
Rank
114
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
72% (508-202)
Career Total W/L
56% (412-327)
79% (19-5)
YTD W/L
67% (4-2)
$28,877,260
Career Prize Money
$350,585
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniil Medvedev | Jason Jung |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 36 | 31 |
| Aces (Total) | 27 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:47 | 1:28:47 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (112/215) | 62% (128/205) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (83/112) | 68% (87/128) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (46/103) | 42% (32/77) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (10/24) | 38% (9/24) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (86/205) | 40% (86/215) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jason Jung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jason Jung
54%
(
56 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Daniil Medvedev
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
2
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniil Medvedev | Jason Jung |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 79% (19/5) | 67% (4/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (46/22) | 67% (8/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (362/299) | 55% (64/52) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 82% (18/4) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 149 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 107 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:38 | 1:26:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 93.71 | 330.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1286/2094) | 65% (233/358) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (929/1286) | 72% (168/233) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (402/808) | 55% (69/125) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (98/225) | 38% (15/40) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (866/2141) | 39% (148/383) |
| Slam W/L | 86% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 77% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (13/17) | 67% (4/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (8/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 56% (9/5) | 0% (2/0) |
Daniil Medvedev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniil Medvedev
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Gael Monfils
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Daniil Medvedev
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Nicolas Jarry
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Dominik Koepfer
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Cameron Norrie
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Marton Fucsovics
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Daniil Medvedev
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tommy Paul
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Holger Rune
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Jung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Aziz Dougaz
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Maximus Jones
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Jason Jung
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Jason Jung
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Yunseong Chung
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Zdenek Kolar
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Medvedev Vs Jung Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
