Danique Havermans vs Vivian Yang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Havermans vs Yang analysis and find out who is favored!
Danique Havermans vs Vivian Yang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Havermans has won 44.56% of points on his second serve, while Yang has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Havermans, in recent form, has won 56.34% of his opponent's second serve points, while Yang has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.33% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Havermans has saved 55.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yang has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Havermans has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 12/ 16), with Yang winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Havermans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Yang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 32/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Havermans has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Yang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Havermans winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Havermans winning 0 and Yang winning 2. The last match between Havermans and Yang was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 03-10-2022, Q3, Hard with Vivian Yang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Havermans and Yang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Havermans winning 0 times and Yang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Havermans winning 0, and Yang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Havermans has played against opponents with an average rank of 23.39 while Yang has played against players with an average rank of 84.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Havermans has won 14% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yang has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Havermans has converted 46.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Havermans 0 - 1 Yang
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
847
Rank
746
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
42% (22-31)
Career Total W/L
60% (33-22)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Danique Havermans | Vivian Yang |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 6 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Danique Havermans | Vivian Yang |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (42/42) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
Aces Total | 7 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
DFs Total | 16 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:1:45 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (104/180) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (73/104) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (37/76) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 57% (13/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 51% (85/168) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Danique Havermans Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Danique Havermans
Player
Chrystal Lopez
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Carina Syrtveit
Player
Danique Havermans
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Danique Havermans
Player
Emma Van Poppel
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 3-6 7-6(5) 11-9 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mariam Atia
Player
Danique Havermans
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Lorena Schaedel
Player
Danique Havermans
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jana Otzipka
Player
Danique Havermans
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Danique Havermans
Player
Olga Golas
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Vivian Yang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Chengyiyi Yuan
Player
Vivian Yang
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
3
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
6
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vivian Yang
Player
Yuhan Liu
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
116)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
13
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
116)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Na Dong
Player
Vivian Yang
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Vivian Yang
Player
Xinyu Cai
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vivian Yang
Player
Unknown Player
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Xichen Zhao
Player
Vivian Yang
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vivian Yang
Player
Zijun Jiang
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
107)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
53 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
55 of
107)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Vivian Yang
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vivian Yang
Player
Natasha Sengphrachanh
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Vivian Yang
54%
(
65 of
120)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
127)
4
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
53%
(
29 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
43 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(7) 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more