Darya Astakhova vs Jiaqi Wang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Oct at 05:26 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Astakhova vs J. Wang

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Astakhova 1 - 0 Wang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Darya Astakhova winning 2 and Jiaqi Wang winning 0. The last match between Darya Astakhova and Jiaqi Wang was at the W35 Qian Daohu, 23-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Darya Astakhova getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Astakhova | 1 |
| Wang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Qian Daohu(10-23-25)
D. Astakhova vs J. Wang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $72,000 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.95% (215-111) | Career Total W/L | 60.91% (148-95) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Astakhova vs J. Wang Match Preview:
- Second serve efficiency highlights a slight advantage for Jiaqi Wang at 38.41% compared to Darya Astakhova's 35.89%. Could this margin make a difference in their match? Yes, as it's often correlated with successful outcomes.
- In returning second serves, Astakhova outshines Wang by securing 51.09% of these points, versus Wang's 48.50%.
- When it comes to returning first serves, Astakhova again has the upper hand, achieving 37.85% compared to Wang's 31.70%.
- Under pressure, Wang is more resilient, saving 47.98% of breakpoints as opposed to Astakhova's 44.97%.
- Over the past year, Astakhova has a higher match win rate at 61.29%, while Wang's is at 57.38%. Does this indicate a potential advantage for Astakhova? Possibly, given the higher consistency.
- On Clay, Astakhova shows impressive results with a win rate of 69%, whereas Wang excels on Hard courts with a 69% win rate.
- Astakhova faces higher-ranked opponents on average, with a rank of 321.48 compared to Wang's 434.39, indicating tougher competition.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Wang has a slightly better record, winning 64% compared to Astakhova's 60%.
- Event-level experience shows Astakhova competing slightly above Wang, suggesting experience might play a role.
Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head comparison between Darya Astakhova and Jiaqi Wang provides a comprehensive view of their strengths and recent performances.
While Jiaqi Wang seems to hold a small edge in second serve points and break point savings, Darya Astakhova demonstrates superior skills in return games and a higher match win rate over the past year. This indicates mental toughness and the ability to respond under pressure.
Astakhova's competition against higher-ranked opponents could mean she's more prepared for challenging matches. The deciding set records slightly favor Wang, but it's not a definitive indicator.
Considering the overall statistics, Darya Astakhova appears to have an advantage in this matchup, making her the more likely winner. However, Wang's resilience under pressure means she remains a formidable opponent should the match become close.
Darya Astakhova vs Jiaqi Wang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Astakhova vs J. Wang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:19:25 | Average Match Time | 1:19:25 |
| 66% (37/56) | 1st Serve % | 72% (33/46) |
| 70% (26/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 33% (11/33) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 65% (30/46) | Return Points Win % | 38% (21/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Astakhova Recent Matches Played
J. Wang Recent Matches Played

D. Astakhova vs J. Wang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.95% (215/111) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.91% (148/95) |
| 62.23% (453/275) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.27% (317/227) |
| 55.74% (3608/2865) | Games Win/Loss | 54.99% (2633/2155) |
| 62.69% (42/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.17% (126/80) |
| 69.13% (159/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 50.00% (14/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 287 | Aces Total | 254 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 924 | Total Double Faults | 253 |
| 1:35:50 | Average Match Time | 1:24:39 |
| 455.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 412.74 |
| 64% (12681/19779) | 1st Serve % | 66% (8581/12952) |
| 60% (7567/12681) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (5089/8581) |
| 46% (3255/7098) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2029/4371) |
| 51% (1493/2919) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (861/1745) |
| 50% (10095/20305) | Return Points Win % | 48% (6285/13152) |
| 14.29% (1/6) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 62.56% (127/76) | Challenger W/L | 55.68% (49/39) |
| 76.32% (87/27) | Futures W/L | 65.13% (99/53) |
| 66% (206/313) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (141/234) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (23/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (16/33) |
| 63% (55/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (36/61) |
| 93% (200/186) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (145/128) |
| 7% (200/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (145/17) |
| 22% (126/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (98/20) |