Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Fleming vs Miliaan Niesten Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fleming vs Niesten analysis and find out who is favored!
David Fleming vs Miliaan Niesten Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fleming has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Niesten has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fleming, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Niesten has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fleming has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niesten has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fleming has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Niesten winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fleming has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 126/ 127), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Niesten has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 140/ 83), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 16/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fleming winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fleming winning 2 and Niesten winning 0. The last match between Fleming and Niesten was at the Tunisia F14 (Hammamet), 12-04-2017, First, Clay with David Fleming getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fleming and Niesten have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fleming winning 0 times and Niesten 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fleming winning 0, and Niesten 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fleming has played against opponents with an average rank of while Niesten has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fleming has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niesten has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fleming has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niesten has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fleming 1 - 0 Niesten
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
431
High
35
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
49% (130-133)
Career Total W/L
58% (229-166)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,790
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Fleming | Miliaan Niesten |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 9 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:0 | 1:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (28/41) | 65% (26/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (16/28) | 42% (11/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (9/13) | 36% (5/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (24/40) | 39% (16/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-2 ret. |
Stats 
David Fleming
Player
Miliaan Niesten
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Fleming | Miliaan Niesten |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
David Fleming Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Alejandro Hidalgo
Player
David Fleming
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Acevedo
Player
David Fleming
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Saez
Player
David Fleming
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Fleming
Player
Tomas Gerini
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
84%
(
89 of
106)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
52%
(
51 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
David Fleming
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
David Fleming
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Miliaan Niesten Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Miliaan Niesten
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
81%
(
30 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Maden
Player
Miliaan Niesten
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
0-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Miliaan Niesten
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Miliaan Niesten
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miliaan Niesten
Player
Yunseong Chung
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makoto Ochi
Player
Miliaan Niesten
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Miliaan Niesten
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miliaan Niesten
Player
Dhruv Sunish
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Miliaan Niesten
41%
(
33 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Miliaan Niesten
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fleming Vs Niesten Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
