Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Perez Sanz vs Pablo Vivero Gonzalez Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sanz vs Gonzalez analysis and find out who is favored!
David Perez Sanz vs Pablo Vivero Gonzalez Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sanz has won 51.36% of points on his second serve, while Gonzalez has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sanz, in recent form, has won 53.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gonzalez has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sanz has saved 58.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gonzalez has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sanz has won 53.13% of matches played (W/L 17/ 15), with Gonzalez winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sanz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 289/ 135), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gonzalez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 291/ 133), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Sanz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.13% of matches (W/L 17/ 15), where as Gonzalez has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sanz winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Sanz winning 4 and Gonzalez winning 4. The last match between Sanz and Gonzalez was at the Spain F13 (Sta. Margarida Montbui), 01-06-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with David Perez Sanz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sanz and Gonzalez have played a deciding set 2 times, with Sanz winning 2 times and Gonzalez 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sanz winning 0, and Gonzalez 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sanz has played against opponents with an average rank of 125.5 while Gonzalez has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sanz has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gonzalez has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sanz has converted 41.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gonzalez has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sanz 2 - 1 Gonzalez
859
Rank
216
High
29
Age
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
283
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
62% (446-271)
Career Total W/L
65% (309-164)
54% (7-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Perez Sanz | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 41 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:40 | 1:7:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (81/144) | 61% (87/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (61/81) | 74% (64/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (31/63) | 55% (31/56) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (48/143) | 36% (52/144) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
David Perez Sanz
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
10
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
8
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-4 5-2 ret. |
Stats
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
David Perez Sanz
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-2 6-7(2) 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Perez Sanz | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (15/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (131/126) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:9 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 70.15 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (509/792) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (335/509) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (138/283) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (41/105) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (364/867) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
David Perez Sanz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Szymon Kielan
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
David Perez Sanz
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
David Perez Sanz
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Gabriele Bosio
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
41%
(
29 of
70)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
David Perez Sanz
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
71%
(
10 of
14)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
8 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
7
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Donski
Player
David Perez Sanz
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Peter Nad
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
David Perez Sanz
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Emilien Demanet
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
110)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
49%
(
48 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Winter Lopez
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reese Stalder
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
12
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Lluc Mir Anglada
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sanz Vs Gonzalez Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
