Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Pichler vs Filip Bergevi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pichler vs Bergevi analysis and find out who is favored!
David Pichler vs Filip Bergevi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pichler has won 50.65% of points on his second serve, while Bergevi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pichler, in recent form, has won 53.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bergevi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.35% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pichler has saved 57.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bergevi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pichler has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 30/ 35), with Bergevi winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Bergevi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 53/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19), where as Bergevi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Pichler winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Pichler winning 4 and Bergevi winning 2. The last match between Pichler and Bergevi was at the M15 Monastir, 23-09-2020, First, Hard with David Pichler getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pichler and Bergevi have played a deciding set 2 times, with Pichler winning 2 times and Bergevi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Pichler winning 3, and Bergevi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pichler has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.94 while Bergevi has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pichler has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bergevi has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pichler has converted 45.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bergevi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pichler 2 - 0 Bergevi
595
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
568
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
56% (342-266)
Career Total W/L
54% (157-134)
45% (9-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Pichler | Filip Bergevi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 33 | 33 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 18 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:42:0 | 3:42:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (151/255) | 58% (140/242) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (96/151) | 70% (98/140) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (52/104) | 44% (45/102) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (7/26) | 31% (9/29) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (99/242) | 42% (107/255) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-6(7) 7-6(7) |
Stats 
David Pichler
Player
Filip Bergevi
62%
(
81 of
131)
1st Serve %
54%
(
75 of
138)
3
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
58 of
75)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
58 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
57 of
138)
130
Total Points Won
139
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Filip Bergevi
56%
(
70 of
124)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
40%
(
49 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Pichler | Filip Bergevi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (9/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (24/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (218/211) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:41 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 273.35 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (857/1362) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (583/857) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (252/505) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (57/128) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (554/1392) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
David Pichler
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Bergevi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelo Zormann
Player
Filip Bergevi
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Dahlin
Player
Filip Bergevi
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Filip Bergevi
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Filip Bergevi
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Filip Bergevi
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurgen Briand
Player
Filip Bergevi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
11
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Filip Bergevi
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Filip Bergevi
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pichler Vs Bergevi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
