Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Poljak vs Paul Jubb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poljak vs Jubb analysis and find out who is favored!
David Poljak vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poljak has won 49.2% of points on his second serve, while Jubb has won 53.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poljak, in recent form, has won 49.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 51.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.72% and 35.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Poljak has saved 59.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 61.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Poljak has won 40.48% of matches played (W/L 17/ 25), with Jubb winning 67.74% (W/L 42/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 103/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 104/ 107). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/ 20), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Poljak winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Poljak winning 2 and Jubb winning 2. The last match between Poljak and Jubb was at the Glasgow Challenger, 12-02-2024, Q3, I.hard with Paul Jubb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Poljak and Jubb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Poljak winning 0 times and Jubb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Poljak winning 0, and Jubb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poljak has played against opponents with an average rank of 149.12 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 292.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poljak has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Poljak has converted 32.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 44.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Poljak 1 - 1 Jubb
893
Rank
370
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
385
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
54% (306-257)
Career Total W/L
69% (189-83)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
66% (19-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$54,540
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Poljak | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:17 | 1:21:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (76/145) | 66% (73/111) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (60/76) | 77% (56/73) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (31/69) | 45% (17/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 18% (3/17) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (38/111) | 37% (54/145) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Paul Jubb
Player
David Poljak
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Paul Jubb
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Poljak | Paul Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 66% (19/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (18/23) | 63% (45/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (213/211) | 55% (388/317) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 71% (10/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (5/8) | 69% (9/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 119 | 125 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 88 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:24 | 1:52:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 125.17 | 275.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (835/1375) | 61% (1325/2158) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (615/835) | 72% (957/1325) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (267/540) | 55% (457/833) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (40/115) | 41% (96/234) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (482/1333) | 41% (955/2325) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 66% (19/10) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 66% (19/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 36% (11/4) |
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
James Watt
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Nikita Ianin
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | bye | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nikita Ianin
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
David Poljak
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yunseong Chung
Player
Paul Jubb
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Egor Gerasimov
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Andrew Fenty
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Jea Moon Lee
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
47 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Poljak Vs Jubb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
