Dayeon Back vs Yujin Kim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does recent performance on second serves compare? Kim has a lower second serve point win rate at 33.05% compared to Back's 37.56%, suggesting a potential advantage for Back.
• What about return games? Kim wins 51.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Back has a slightly higher success rate at 53.38%. In first serve returns, both are quite similar, with Kim at 34.13% and Back at 34.39%.
• When facing breakpoints, Kim excels, saving 51.15% of them in recent form, higher than Back's 47.39%. This could be crucial in tight moments during the match.
• Over the past year, Kim has won 48.72% of their matches, trailing behind Back, who has a remarkable 69.62% win rate. This indicates Back's overall better form.
• Looking at career surface performances, both players have their best win percentage on Hard courts, with Back being more dominant at 69% compared to Kim's 45%. How do these surface stats influence the outcome? It's possible that Back's superior Hard court performance gives them an edge.
• Level of play competition shows Kim mainly in Future/ITF tournaments with a 53.33% win rate, while Back competes more in Challengers/ITF with a 65.96% win rate, possibly indicating a higher competitive level for Back.
• Considering opponent quality, Kim has faced players with an average ranking of 452.87, slightly lower than Back, whose opponents averaged a ranking of 445.04. This slight difference suggests both have faced similar levels of competition.
• In deciding set situations, Back has a slight advantage, winning 68% compared to Kim's 64%. This could be pivotal in longer matches.
• Breakpoint conversion rates are telling; Kim converts a notable 51.67% of their chances, significantly better than Back's 33.98%. This stat may impact in crucial moments of the match.

Editorial Prediction (May 29, 2025, UTC):

Kim and Back bring unique strengths to this matchup. Kim excels in saving breakpoints and converting opportunities, suggesting resilience under pressure, which will be key in tightly contested games.

Back, on the other hand, has shown greater overall form over the year with a superior win percentage and higher competitive experience in the Challengers tier, reflecting more consistent performances against stronger opponents.

Both players have similar success in deciding sets, but Back's outstanding winning form on Hard courts and better recent performance suggests a slightly enhanced potential based on recent data.

Considering these factors, Back appears to have a marginal edge in this upcoming contest due to better second serve performances and higher overall match win rates. Therefore, Back is more likely to triumph in this encounter.