Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dayne Kelly vs Steven De Waard Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kelly vs Waard analysis and find out who is favored!
Dayne Kelly vs Steven De Waard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kelly has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Waard has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kelly, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Waard has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kelly has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Waard has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kelly has won 25% of matches played (W/L 2/ 6), with Waard winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kelly has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 33/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Waard has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 41/ 42).
- Player level: In the last year, Kelly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Waard has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kelly winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kelly winning 2 and Waard winning 0. The last match between Kelly and Waard was at the Australia F6, 29-09-2014, Semifinals, Hard with Dayne Kelly getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kelly and Waard have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kelly winning 0 times and Waard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kelly winning 0, and Waard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kelly has played against opponents with an average rank of 48 while Waard has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kelly has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Waard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kelly has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Waard has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kelly 1 - 0 Waard
771
Rank
252
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
707
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
61% (451-291)
Career Total W/L
51% (66-64)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dayne Kelly | Steven De Waard |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dayne Kelly | Steven De Waard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Dayne Kelly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Dayne Kelly
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve %
68%
(
15 of
22)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
23
Total Points Won
23
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isaac Becroft
Player
Dayne Kelly
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
3
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Loutit
Player
Dayne Kelly
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Cihan Akay
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Dayne Kelly
58%
(
72 of
124)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
111)
4
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
48 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
118
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Seon Yong Han
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Dayne Kelly
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(6) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Dayne Kelly
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Yuta Shimizu
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Steven De Waard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Steven De Waard
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Ruben Mccormack
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
6
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
8
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
James Frawley
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Steven De Waard
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Thomas Fancutt
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Kelly Vs Waard Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
