Deney Wassermann vs Philip Sekulic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wassermann vs Sekulic analysis and find out who is favored!
Deney Wassermann vs Philip Sekulic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wassermann has won 50.71% of points on his second serve, while Sekulic has won 50.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wassermann, in recent form, has won 51.27% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sekulic has won 48.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.93% and 28.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wassermann has saved 61.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sekulic has saved 59.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wassermann has won 59.18% of matches played (W/L 29/ 20), with Sekulic winning 54.41% (W/L 37/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 68/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19), where as Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.65% of matches (W/L 18/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wassermann winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wassermann winning 2 and Sekulic winning 0. The last match between Wassermann and Sekulic was at the M25 Den Haag, 30-06-2022, Second, Clay with Deney Wassermann getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wassermann and Sekulic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wassermann winning 0 times and Sekulic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wassermann winning 0, and Sekulic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wassermann has played against opponents with an average rank of 176.86 while Sekulic has played against players with an average rank of 249.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wassermann has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sekulic has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wassermann has converted 37.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sekulic has converted 41.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wassermann 1 - 0 Sekulic
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
704
Rank
702
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
267
Rank
263
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (99-68)
Career Total W/L
55% (83-67)
60% (6-4)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$92,390
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wassermann VS Sekulic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Deney Wassermann | Philip Sekulic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 2:13:0 | 2:13:0 |
1st Serve % | 75% (59/79) | 68% (54/79) |
1st Serve Win% | 64% (38/59) | 54% (29/54) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (9/20) | 44% (11/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 38% (3/8) |
Return Points W% | 49% (39/79) | 41% (32/79) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Wassermann VS Sekulic H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Philip Sekulic
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Deney Wassermann | Philip Sekulic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (6/4) | 41% (7/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 47% (18/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (113/97) | 49% (182/188) |
Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 50% (7/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.36 |
Aces Total | 37 | 65 |
DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.25 |
DFs Total | 36 | 44 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:36 | 1:55:16 |
Avg Opp Rank | 131.8 | 317.59 |
1st Serve % | 55% (333/610) | 63% (758/1205) |
1st Serve W% | 74% (246/333) | 67% (510/758) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (147/277) | 51% (227/447) |
BPs Won% Total | 27% (20/73) | 44% (41/94) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (251/654) | 37% (423/1142) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 41% (7/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 43% (3/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/4) |
1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 70% (10/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 30% (10/3) |
1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (7/0) |
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Deney Wassermann
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ignacio Buse
Player
Deney Wassermann
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Deney Wassermann
78%
(
77 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
76%
(
26 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
95)
6
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Raphael Calzi
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Gianluca Mager
Player
Philip Sekulic
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Liam Draxl
Player
Philip Sekulic
64%
(
74 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
118)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Francisco Comesana
Player
Philip Sekulic
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
45%
(
25 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Vadym Ursu
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Philip Sekulic
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Philip Sekulic
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more